Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Rhizobium + PSB + phosphorus 50 kg/ha gave maximum number of nodules/plant (8.55) in greengram than other treatments.

A claim from Influence of biofertilizers and phosphorus on growth and yield of greengram · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium + PSB + phosphorus 50 kg/ha gave maximum number of nodules/plant (8.55) in greengram than other treatments.

Taxon
Greengram (Phaseolus radiatus L.)Vigna radiata var. radiatae0
Treatment
Rhizobium + PSB + Phosphorus 50 kg/hae1
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume1symbiont
Second interactor
PSBe1symbiont
Outcome
number of nodules/plante1
Direction
maximume1
Value
8.55e1
Comparator
other treatmentse1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth and yield of Greengram (Phaseolus radiatus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 263–316
e1

“treatment 9 (Rhizobium + PSB + Phosphorus 50 kg/ha) recorded significant and higher plant height (47.13 cm), maximum number of nodules/plant (8.55), higher plant dry weight (7.75 g), maximum number of pods/plant (29.51), maximum number of seeds/pod (7.47), higher test weight (40.59 g), higher seed yield (1204.92 kg/ha), and higher stover yield (2209.93 kg/ha), maximum gross return (97,498.83 INR/ha), maximum net return (64,684.83 INR/ha), maximum B:C ratio (1.97) was recorded in treatment 9 (Rhizobium + PSB + Phosphorus 50 kg/ha) as compared to other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 344–911

Title

Influence of biofertilizers and phosphorus on growth and yield of greengram

Aliya Khan; Victor Debbarma; Abhijeet Shyamsingh Chouhan; et al. International Journal of Research in Agronomy 2024. doi:10.33545/2618060x.2024.v7.i5a.665

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-e30febcd378eac0cd89da6f34002ac0a6a6c78b20bf8cf803fe1bb32125cdc31 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

Rhizobium · symbiosis · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

53 papers: 51 positive, 2 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

44 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

phosphorus · symbiosis · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

42 papers: 41 positive, 1 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

33 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.