Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Dicamba reduced Wakefield grain yield by 95% in a sensitivity study.

A claim from Response of ‘Wakefield’ Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum) to Dicamba1 · 2001

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dicamba reduced Wakefield grain yield by 95% in a sensitivity study.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Material
Wakefielde0
Treatment
Dicambae0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
95%e0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dicamba, applied within the recommended growth stage interval, reduced the grain yield of Wakefield winter wheat by 95% in a herbicide sensitivity study at Michigan State University.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–255

Title

Response of ‘Wakefield’ Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum) to Dicamba1

MATTHEW J. RINELLA; JAMES J. KELLS; RICHARD W. WARD Weed Technology 2001. doi:10.1614/0890-037x(2001)015[0523:rowwwt]2.0.co;2

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-e25ef6c6f498206443ac4c2c7be6820fc486354c0c18f85d4d3ea1e21f9c1e89 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

dicamba · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 7 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.