Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Foliar sodium selenate raised Se concentration by 112.5% versus control in non-calcareous soil.

A claim from The effect of selenium biofortification in alfalfa (Medicago sativa) · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar sodium selenate raised Se concentration by 112.5% versus control in non-calcareous soil.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
foliar application of sodium selenatet1
Outcome
Se concentratione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
112.5%e0
Comparator
control treatmente0
Setting
non-calcareouse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“By the usage of this treatment, Se concentration was increased up to 112.5% and 182%, respectively, compared with the control treatment in non-calcareous and calcareous soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–1005
t0

“alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–50
t1

“foliar application of sodium selenate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–807

Title

The effect of selenium biofortification in alfalfa (Medicago sativa)

Babak Motesharezadeh; Samira Ghorbani; Hossein Ali Alikhani Journal of Plant Nutrition 2019. doi:10.1080/01904167.2019.1676900

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-e28342c7f06cc807f1fb24187c1b7a96aebc3a0a727a9f2c5067d2a41010ec80 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

sodium selenate · nutrient: content · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 14 positive, 4 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.