Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Fruit from regime 2 had reduced size, compression firmness and stem retention force compared with fruit from regime 1.

A claim from Impact of management regimes on fruit quality of sweet cherry (Prunus aviumL.) · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit from regime 2 had reduced size, compression firmness and stem retention force compared with fruit from regime 1.

Taxon
sweet cherryPrunus aviume0
Treatment
regime 2 based on organic amendments and no herbicidee2
Outcome
size, compression firmness, and stem retention forcee2
Direction
reducede2
Comparator
regime 1e2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“fruit from regime 2 based on organic amendments and no herbicide had higher total soluble solids and malic acid concentration but reduced size, compression firmness, and stem retention force than fruit from regime 1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 332–547
e0

“This study compared the effect of two management regimes with or without effective microorganisms (EMs) on fruit quality of sweet cherry (Prunus avium L. cultivar Sweetheart)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 102–276

Title

Impact of management regimes on fruit quality of sweet cherry (Prunus aviumL.)

Bi Zheng Tan; Sally A. Bound; Alieta Eyles Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 2017. doi:10.1080/21683565.2017.1380740

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-e28eb0a29aae1a1c21a85fa630f525413bd1daf466edc9d43d00145f30ca220d · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

organic · quality: postharvest · Prunus avium (sweet cherry)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.