Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Pseudomonas fluorescens reduced Radopholus similis populations by 48.7%.

A claim from Biological control of lesion nematodes in banana · 2006

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudomonas fluorescens reduced Radopholus similis populations by 48.7%.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
Pseudomonas fluorescense1
Interactor
Radopholus similisRadopholus similise0pest
Second interactor
Pseudomonas fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
Radopholus similise0
Direction
reducede0
Value
48.7e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Radopholus similis
Radopholus similis · InteractorFlorida Division of Plant Industry Archive, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · Second interactorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“populations of Radopholus similis, Pratylenchus coffeae and Helicotylenchus multicinctus were reduced by 48.7, 46.3 and 44.3%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–768
e1

“Pseudomonas fluorescens was also the most effective to control nematodes until harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–620
t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–48

Title

Biological control of lesion nematodes in banana

A. Shanthi; G. Rajendran Nematologia mediterranea 2006

Other claims from this paper (19)

Record rev-e2f2d40fa4111ff0da8f755ad9cfa2c67726ad488851e1e0db2fc582f12a64b1 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

Pseudomonas fluorescens · Radopholus similis · MusaResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.