Paper · 2006 · Nematologia mediterranea

Biological control of lesion nematodes in banana

A. Shanthi; G. Rajendran

20
claims
43
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field trials were conducted to assess the efficacy of biological agents on the control of root lesion nematodes in banana in comparison with the nematicide carbofuran. The bio-agents were Pseudomonas fluorescens, Trichoderma viride, Glomus fasciculatum, Bacillus subtilis and Paecilomyces lilacinus. Application of P. fluorescens at 20 g/plant gave the greatest bunch length (95 cm), bunch weight (24 kg), number of hands per bunch (10) and number of fingers per bunch (176). The increases in yield parameters ranged from 59 to 110%. Pseudomonas fluorescens was also the most effective to control nematodes until harvest as the populations of Radopholus similis, Pratylenchus coffeae and Helicotylenchus multicinctus were reduced by 48.7, 46.3 and 44.3%, respectively. Soil application of T. viride or carbofuran were the next best treatments followed by the application of G. fasciculatum, B. subtilis and P. lilacinus. The lowest bunch weight (15 kg) was obtained from the control plants. Carbofuran was the most effective to control nematodes until three months after planting, but its efficacy thereafter was reduced and remained at a level similar to that of P. fluorescens. Root colonization by P. fluorescens, T. viride, G. fasciculatum, and B. subtilis was 105 × 108cfu/g, 60 × 106 cfu/g, 44% and 58 × 108 cells/g of root.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. fluorescens at 20 g/plant gave the greatest bunch length.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
P. fluorescens at 20 g/plante0
Interactor
P. fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
bunch lengthe0
Direction
greateste0
Value
95 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of P. fluorescens at 20 g/plant gave the greatest bunch length (95 cm), bunch weight (24 kg), number of hands per bunch (10) and number of fingers per bunch (176).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 300–475 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. fluorescens at 20 g/plant gave the greatest bunch weight.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
P. fluorescens at 20 g/plante0
Interactor
P. fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
bunch weighte0
Direction
greateste0
Value
24 kge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of P. fluorescens at 20 g/plant gave the greatest bunch length (95 cm), bunch weight (24 kg), number of hands per bunch (10) and number of fingers per bunch (176).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 300–475 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. fluorescens at 20 g/plant gave the greatest number of hands per bunch.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
P. fluorescens at 20 g/plante0
Interactor
P. fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
number of hands per bunche0
Direction
greateste0
Value
10e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of P. fluorescens at 20 g/plant gave the greatest bunch length (95 cm), bunch weight (24 kg), number of hands per bunch (10) and number of fingers per bunch (176).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 300–475 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. fluorescens at 20 g/plant gave the greatest number of fingers per bunch.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
P. fluorescens at 20 g/plante0
Interactor
P. fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
number of fingers per bunche0
Direction
greateste0
Value
176e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of P. fluorescens at 20 g/plant gave the greatest bunch length (95 cm), bunch weight (24 kg), number of hands per bunch (10) and number of fingers per bunch (176).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 300–475 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–48 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield parameters increased by 59 to 110%.

Taxon
bananat0
Outcome
yield parameterse0
Direction
increasese0
Value
59 to 110%e0

Verbatim

e0

“The increases in yield parameters ranged from 59 to 110%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 476–533 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudomonas fluorescens reduced Radopholus similis populations by 48.7%.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
Pseudomonas fluorescense1
Interactor
Radopholus similisRadopholus similise0pest
Second interactor
Pseudomonas fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
Radopholus similise0
Direction
reducede0
Value
48.7e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Radopholus similis
Radopholus similis · InteractorFlorida Division of Plant Industry Archive, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · Second interactorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“populations of Radopholus similis, Pratylenchus coffeae and Helicotylenchus multicinctus were reduced by 48.7, 46.3 and 44.3%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–768 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pseudomonas fluorescens was also the most effective to control nematodes until harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–620 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudomonas fluorescens reduced Pratylenchus coffeae populations by 46.3%.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
Pseudomonas fluorescense1
Interactor
Pratylenchus coffeaePratylenchus coffeaee0pest
Second interactor
Pseudomonas fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
Pratylenchus coffeaee0
Direction
reducede0
Value
46.3e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pratylenchus coffeae
Pratylenchus coffeae · InteractorUSDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · Second interactorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“populations of Radopholus similis, Pratylenchus coffeae and Helicotylenchus multicinctus were reduced by 48.7, 46.3 and 44.3%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–768 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pseudomonas fluorescens was also the most effective to control nematodes until harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–620 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudomonas fluorescens reduced Helicotylenchus multicinctus populations by 44.3%.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
Pseudomonas fluorescense1
Interactor
Helicotylenchus multicinctusHelicotylenchus multicinctuse0pest
Second interactor
Pseudomonas fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
Helicotylenchus multicinctuse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
44.3e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · Second interactorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“populations of Radopholus similis, Pratylenchus coffeae and Helicotylenchus multicinctus were reduced by 48.7, 46.3 and 44.3%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–768 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pseudomonas fluorescens was also the most effective to control nematodes until harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–620 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–48 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T. viride application ranked next after P. fluorescens.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
T. viridee0
Interactor
T. virideTrichoderma viridee0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
next best treatmentse0
Direction
next best treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trichoderma viride
Trichoderma viride · InteractorKatja Schulz · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil application of T. viride or carbofuran were the next best treatments followed by the application of G. fasciculatum, B. subtilis and P. lilacinus.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–920 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–48 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbofuran application ranked next after P. fluorescens.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
carbofurane0
Outcome
next best treatmentse0
Direction
next best treatmentse0

Verbatim

e0

“Soil application of T. viride or carbofuran were the next best treatments followed by the application of G. fasciculatum, B. subtilis and P. lilacinus.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–920 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–48 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

G. fasciculatum ranked below T. viride and carbofuran.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
G. fasciculatume0
Interactor
G. fasciculatumRhizophagus fasciculatuse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
G. fasciculatume0

Verbatim

e0

“Soil application of T. viride or carbofuran were the next best treatments followed by the application of G. fasciculatum, B. subtilis and P. lilacinus.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–920 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–48 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. subtilis ranked below T. viride and carbofuran.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
B. subtilise0
Interactor
B. subtilisBacillus subtilise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
B. subtilise0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil application of T. viride or carbofuran were the next best treatments followed by the application of G. fasciculatum, B. subtilis and P. lilacinus.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–920 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–48 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. lilacinus ranked below T. viride and carbofuran.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
P. lilacinuse0
Interactor
P. lilacinusPurpureocillium lilacinume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
P. lilacinuse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Purpureocillium lilacinum
Purpureocillium lilacinum · InteractorAuthor not explicitly stated. Article is by Jeanne Carey, Ron D’Amico, Deanna A. Sutton, and Michael G. Rinald · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil application of T. viride or carbofuran were the next best treatments followed by the application of G. fasciculatum, B. subtilis and P. lilacinus.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–920 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–48 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control plants had the lowest bunch weight of 15 kg.

Taxon
bananat0
Material
control plantse0
Outcome
bunch weighte0
Direction
loweste0
Value
15 kge0

Verbatim

e0

“The lowest bunch weight (15 kg) was obtained from the control plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–990 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–48 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbofuran was most effective for nematode control through three months after planting.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
Carbofurane0
Outcome
control nematodese0
Direction
most effectivee0
Qualifier
until three months after plantinge0

Verbatim

e0

“Carbofuran was the most effective to control nematodes until three months after planting, but its efficacy thereafter was reduced and remained at a level similar to that of P. fluorescens.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1179 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–48 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbofuran efficacy later fell to a level similar to P. fluorescens.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
Carbofurane0
Outcome
efficacye0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
P. fluorescense0

Verbatim

e0

“Carbofuran was the most effective to control nematodes until three months after planting, but its efficacy thereafter was reduced and remained at a level similar to that of P. fluorescens.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1179 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–48 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. fluorescens colonized banana roots at 105 × 108cfu/g.

Taxon
bananat0
Interactor
P. fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense0symbiont
Outcome
Root colonizatione0
Value
105 × 108cfu/ge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root colonization by P. fluorescens, T. viride, G. fasciculatum, and B. subtilis was 105 × 108cfu/g, 60 × 106 cfu/g, 44% and 58 × 108 cells/g of root.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1180–1330 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–48 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T. viride colonized banana roots at 60 × 106 cfu/g.

Taxon
bananat0
Interactor
T. virideTrichoderma viridee0symbiont
Outcome
Root colonizatione0
Value
60 × 106 cfu/ge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trichoderma viride
Trichoderma viride · InteractorKatja Schulz · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root colonization by P. fluorescens, T. viride, G. fasciculatum, and B. subtilis was 105 × 108cfu/g, 60 × 106 cfu/g, 44% and 58 × 108 cells/g of root.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1180–1330 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–48 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

G. fasciculatum colonized banana roots at 44%.

Taxon
bananat0
Interactor
G. fasciculatumRhizophagus fasciculatuse0symbiont
Outcome
Root colonizatione0
Value
44%e0

Verbatim

e0

“Root colonization by P. fluorescens, T. viride, G. fasciculatum, and B. subtilis was 105 × 108cfu/g, 60 × 106 cfu/g, 44% and 58 × 108 cells/g of root.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1180–1330 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–48 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. subtilis colonized banana roots at 58 × 108 cells/g of root.

Taxon
bananat0
Interactor
B. subtilisBacillus subtilise0symbiont
Outcome
Root colonizatione0
Value
58 × 108 cells/g of roote0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root colonization by P. fluorescens, T. viride, G. fasciculatum, and B. subtilis was 105 × 108cfu/g, 60 × 106 cfu/g, 44% and 58 × 108 cells/g of root.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1180–1330 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–48 · show in text ↑

Pseudomonas fluorescens · Helicotylenchus multicinctus · MusaResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Pseudomonas fluorescens · Radopholus similis · MusaResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Pseudomonas fluorescens · yield · MusaResults agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.