Abstract
Experiments were conducted in a farmer's field, located at Dhanuvachapuram area of Trivandrum district of Kerala, for two consecutive years, 2015–2016 and 2016–2017, for the management of Meloidogyne incognita. The experiments consisted of eight treatments, including untreated check. These treatments were: T1-Pseudomonas fluorescens sucker/rhizome treatment @ 5g/sucker, T2-Trichoderma viride sucker treatment @ 5g/sucker, T3-P. fluorescens pit application @ 10g/plant at planting, T4-T. viride pit application @ 10g/plant at planting, T5-P. fluorescens sucker treatment + pit application (45 DAP), T6-T. viride sucker treatment + pit application (45 DAP), T7-Paring + hot water treatment + neem cake 1kg a.i/ha; and T8-untreated control. P. fluorescens sucker treatment + pit application (45 DAP) was the most effective treatment in increasing the yield of banana (27.2 t/ha) and reducing the population of nematodes in soil (166.7 nematodes/200 cc soil) and roots (63.8 nematodes/5g roots). This was followed by the application of P. fluorescens sucker/rhizome treatment @ 5g/sucker. P. fluorescens sucker treatment + pit application (45 DAP) was statistically superior treatment in reducing the number of galls/5g roots (30.3galls/5g roots), as compared to control (0.53galls/5g roots).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
P. fluorescens sucker treatment with pit application at 45 DAP was the most effective treatment for increasing banana yield, to 27.2 t/ha.
- Taxon
- bananae1
- Treatment
- P. fluorescens sucker treatment + pit application (45 DAP)e1
- Outcome
- yield of bananae1
- Direction
- increasinge1
- Value
- 27.2 t/hae1
- Setting
- farmer's fielde0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Experiments were conducted in a farmer's field, located at Dhanuvachapuram area of Trivandrum district of Kerala”
e1“P. fluorescens sucker treatment + pit application (45 DAP) was the most effective treatment in increasing the yield of banana (27.2 t/ha)”
Claim · model-written summary
P. fluorescens sucker treatment with pit application at 45 DAP reduced the nematode population in soil to 166.7 nematodes per 200 cc soil.
- Taxon
- bananae1
- Treatment
- P. fluorescens sucker treatment + pit application (45 DAP)e1
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognitae3pest - Outcome
- population of nematodes in soile4
- Direction
- reducinge4
- Value
- 166.7 nematodes/200 cc soile4
- Setting
- farmer's fielde0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Experiments were conducted in a farmer's field, located at Dhanuvachapuram area of Trivandrum district of Kerala”
e1“P. fluorescens sucker treatment + pit application (45 DAP) was the most effective treatment in increasing the yield of banana (27.2 t/ha)”
e3“for the management of Meloidogyne incognita”
e4“reducing the population of nematodes in soil (166.7 nematodes/200 cc soil) and roots (63.8 nematodes/5g roots)”
Claim · model-written summary
P. fluorescens sucker treatment with pit application at 45 DAP reduced the nematode population in banana roots to 63.8 nematodes per 5 g roots.
- Taxon
- bananae1
- Organ / stage
- rootse4
- Treatment
- P. fluorescens sucker treatment + pit application (45 DAP)e1
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognitae3pest - Outcome
- population of nematodese4
- Direction
- reducinge4
- Value
- 63.8 nematodes/5g rootse4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e1“P. fluorescens sucker treatment + pit application (45 DAP) was the most effective treatment in increasing the yield of banana (27.2 t/ha)”
e3“for the management of Meloidogyne incognita”
e4“reducing the population of nematodes in soil (166.7 nematodes/200 cc soil) and roots (63.8 nematodes/5g roots)”
Claim · model-written summary
P. fluorescens sucker treatment with pit application at 45 DAP was statistically superior in reducing galls on banana roots, to 30.3 galls per 5 g roots against 0.53 in control.
- Taxon
- bananae1
- Organ / stage
- rootse5
- Treatment
- P. fluorescens sucker treatment + pit application (45 DAP)e5
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognitae3pest - Outcome
- number of galls/5g rootse5
- Direction
- reducinge5
- Value
- 30.3galls/5g rootse5
- Qualifier
- 0.53galls/5g rootse5
- Comparator
- controle5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e1“P. fluorescens sucker treatment + pit application (45 DAP) was the most effective treatment in increasing the yield of banana (27.2 t/ha)”
e3“for the management of Meloidogyne incognita”
e5“P. fluorescens sucker treatment + pit application (45 DAP) was statistically superior treatment in reducing the number of galls/5g roots (30.3galls/5g roots), as compared to control (0.53galls/5g roots)”
The same questions in other papers
Pseudomonas fluorescens · Meloidogyne incognita · MusaResults agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
Pseudomonas fluorescens · yield · MusaResults agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.