Intervention effectmodel-written summary

75% RDF via drip irrigation gave the highest output-input ratio of 2.69 versus 1.79 in control.

A claim from Standardization of fertilizer requirement through fertigation for coconut under Krishna Godavari zone of Andhra Pradesh · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

75% RDF via drip irrigation gave the highest output-input ratio of 2.69 versus 1.79 in control.

Taxon
coconutt0
Treatment
75% RDF i.e., 375 g N, 240 g P2O5 and 1875 g K2O per palm per year through drip irrigation in eight splits from October to Maye0
Outcome
output-input ratioe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
2.69e0
Qualifier
1.79e0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Verbatim

e0

“application of 75% RDF i.e., 375 g N, 240 g P2O5 and 1875 g K2O per palm per year through drip irrigation in eight splits from October to May resulted in higher nut yield per plam with the highest output-input ratio (2.69) when compared to control (1.79)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 994–1248
t0

“coconut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–73

Title

Standardization of fertilizer requirement through fertigation for coconut under Krishna Godavari zone of Andhra Pradesh

E. Padma; G. Ramanandam; K. Ravindra Kumar; et al. Indian Journal of Horticulture 2019. doi:10.5958/0974-0112.2019.00100.2

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-e301b9ad989adffd2a62ec75bb7f5da852e88cb3cf9e0cc2c077efdae90b9415 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Cocos nucifera (coconut palm)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
    Deficit irrigation reduced coconut fruit yield.

    Sustained deficit irrigation on yield and fruit water quality of dwarf green coconut · 2022

    Opposite direction

  2. positive
    Annual leaf production and leaf nutrient status of coconut were better in the irrigated treatments than in the rainfed control.

    INFLUENCE OF DRIP IRRIGATION ON GROWTH, NUT CHARACTERS AND YIELD OF COCONUT IN LITTORAL SANDY SOIL · 2002 · compared with rainfed control

    Same direction

  3. positive
    Bunches per palm per year reached 13 under full fertigation and mulch, versus 8 in the control.

    Effect of Drip Irrigation with Fertigation and Plastic Mulching on Growth and Yield of Coconut (Cocos nucifera L.) · 2017 · compared with control treatment without mulch

    Same direction

See all 4 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Cocos nucifera (coconut palm)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
    P and K fertilization alone or together increased coconut production per plant.

    Nutrition and production of coconut palm cultivated with mineral fertilization in the state of Pará · 2021

    Same direction

  2. positive
    Coconut trees with four applications of 60 kg P2O5/ha/year had higher yield than other treatments under saline intrusion.

    Effects of phosphorus fertilizer on growth, yield and quality of coconut at early reproductive stage under saline intrusion condition in Mekong Delta · 2020 · compared with other treatments

    Same direction

See all 3 papers →

potassium · yield · Cocos nucifera (coconut palm)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
    P and K fertilization alone or together increased coconut production per plant.

    Nutrition and production of coconut palm cultivated with mineral fertilization in the state of Pará · 2021

    Same direction

  2. positive
    K deficiency reduced coconut yield.

    Fertilizer Responses by Coconuts (Cocos nucifera) on Two Contrasting Jamaican Soils · 1969

    Same directionAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

See all 3 papers →

3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.