Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Ammonia volatilization was increased under SRI compared with TF, on average 22% higher in total.

A claim from Rice yield, nitrogen utilization and ammonia volatilization as influenced by modified rice cultivation at varying nitrogen rates · 2010

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonia volatilization was increased under SRI compared with TF, on average 22% higher in total.

Treatment
SRIe1
Outcome
ammonia volatilizatione1
Direction
increasede1
Value
22%e2
Comparator
TFe1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10
e1

“Ammonia volatilization was increased significantly under SRI compared with TF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–860
e2

“the average total amount of ammonia volatilization loss during the rice growth stage under SRI was 22% higher than TF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–982

Title

Rice yield, nitrogen utilization and ammonia volatilization as influenced by modified rice cultivation at varying nitrogen rates

Limei Zhao; Lianghuan Wu; Cunjun Dong; et al. Agricultural Sciences 2010. doi:10.4236/as.2010.11002

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-e318e7b7e12bb5ba9ba806c262b632b851547383473327e6ae5d79041f52405b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

irrigation · environment: emissions · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

127 papers: 109 positive, 18 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this claim · 109 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

118 papers more in this group

See all 127 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.