Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Component crop yields were higher under sole cropping than under intercropping.

A claim from INFLUENCE OF CROPPING SYSTEM AND WEED MANAGEMENT PRACTICE ON EMERGENCE, GROWTH OF WEEDS, YIELD OF MAIZE (Zea mays L.) AND COWPEA (Vigna unguiculata L.) · 2014

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Component crop yields were higher under sole cropping than under intercropping.

Taxon
maize and cowpeaVigna unguiculataZea mayse0
Treatment
sole croppinge6
Outcome
component crop yieldse6
Direction
highere6
Comparator
intercrope6

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield of maize and cowpea were examined at Ilorin, in the southern Guinea savanna”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 116–197
e6

“component crop yields were higher under the sole cropping than in the intercrop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–1007

Title

INFLUENCE OF CROPPING SYSTEM AND WEED MANAGEMENT PRACTICE ON EMERGENCE, GROWTH OF WEEDS, YIELD OF MAIZE (Zea mays L.) AND COWPEA (Vigna unguiculata L.)

Takim, Felix Ogar; Fadayomi, Omosuyi; Ekeleme, Friday Hrčak Portal of scientific journals of Croatia (University Computing Centre) 2014

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-e32c65a995dc824956ce717ebe3758a3c36015f452eda8864edee1f5dcdecbf2 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

intercropping · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

103 papers: 63 positive, 40 negative or no effect

62 papers in the same direction as this claim · 33 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

94 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

intercropping · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

834 papers: 613 positive, 221 negative or no effect

612 papers in the same direction as this claim · 181 in the opposite direction · 40 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

825 papers more in this group

See all 834 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.