Intervention effectmodel-written summary

H. crustuliniforme inoculation increased poplar Cu and Pb accumulation in contaminated soils relative to uninoculated plants.

A claim from Influence of mycorrhizal inoculation on growth of micropropagated Populus × canescens lines in metal-contaminated soils · 2014

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

H. crustuliniforme inoculation increased poplar Cu and Pb accumulation in contaminated soils relative to uninoculated plants.

Taxon
PoplarPopuluse0
Treatment
inoculated with H. crustuliniformee0
Interactor
H. crustuliniformeHebeloma crustuliniformee0symbiont
Outcome
concentrations of Cu and Pbe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
uninoculated plantse0
Setting
contaminated soilse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Hebeloma crustuliniforme
Hebeloma crustuliniforme · InteractorThis image was created by user Hamilton (ham) at Mushroom Observer , a source for mycological images. You can contact this user here . · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Poplar microplants inoculated with H. crustuliniforme and selected strains of P. involutus accumulated higher concentrations of Cu and Pb when grown in contaminated soils than the uninoculated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 822–1021

Title

Influence of mycorrhizal inoculation on growth of micropropagated Populus × canescens lines in metal-contaminated soils

Krystyna Bojarczuk; Leszek Karliński; Teresa Hazubska-Przybył; et al. New Forests 2014. doi:10.1007/s11056-014-9455-3

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-e32d554daf4d8e9d7ea37d124b6f3f94e225cfb99b5f46603431671ad07dd46e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

inoculation · nutrient: content · Populus (poplar)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive
See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.