Intervention effectmodel-written summary

When rust development increased late in the season, fungicides applied at milk gave better disease control (57.8%) than fungicides applied at tassel.

A claim from Multiyear Evaluation of Fungicide Efficacy and Application Timing for Control of Southern Rust in Hybrid Corn in Arkansas · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

When rust development increased late in the season, fungicides applied at milk gave better disease control (57.8%) than fungicides applied at tassel.

Taxon
hybrid cornZea mays subsp. mayst0
Treatment
fungicides applied at milke4
Interactor
southern rustt0pathogen
Outcome
disease controle4
Direction
bettere4
Value
57.8%e4
Qualifier
a trende4
Comparator
tassele4

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Control of Southern Rust in Hybrid Corn in Arkansas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–121
e4

“When rust development increased later in the season, after milk growth stage, a trend of better disease control was observed with fungicides applied at milk (57.8%) compared with tassel (35.2%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1238

Title

Multiyear Evaluation of Fungicide Efficacy and Application Timing for Control of Southern Rust in Hybrid Corn in Arkansas

Travis R. Faske; Michael Emerson Plant Disease 2021. doi:10.1094/pdis-06-20-1247-re

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-e3350f5be4aaae903d2cc50a1fb1311eb7621bf78095d0345ac5c9378ade59cb · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

fungicide · control · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 7 positive, 3 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.