Paper · 2014 · Yumi kexue

Toxicity and Field Control Effect of Nine Fungicides Against Fusarium Ear Rot

Sui Yun-ha

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Toxicity of nine fungicides to Fusarium verticillioide and Fusarium graminearum were tested by toxic media method in lab and control experiment was also conducted in the field. Control efficacy and treatment application of chemical and biological fungicide to corn ear rot were comprehensive evaluated. The result of toxicity indicated that Difenoconazole and Thiophanate-methyl showed strong toxicity against Fusarium graminearum, Thiophanate-methyl, Difenoconazole showed strong toxicity against Fusarium verticillioides. The results of field control indicated that the control efficacies of Iprodione and Jingangmeisu were 92.3% and 80.64%, and control efficacy of spraying fungicides after inoculation, was better than that of inoculation after spraying fungicides.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Difenoconazole showed strong toxicity against Fusarium graminearum.

Treatment
Difenoconazolee0
Interactor
Fusarium graminearumFusarium graminearume0pathogen
Outcome
toxicity against Fusarium graminearume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · InteractorScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Difenoconazole and Thiophanate-methyl showed strong toxicity against Fusarium graminearum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–430 · show in text ↑
e1

“Control efficacy and treatment application of chemical and biological fungicide to corn ear rot were comprehensive evaluated.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–302 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiophanate-methyl showed strong toxicity against Fusarium graminearum.

Treatment
Thiophanate-methyle0
Interactor
Fusarium graminearumFusarium graminearume0pathogen
Outcome
toxicity against Fusarium graminearume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · InteractorScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Difenoconazole and Thiophanate-methyl showed strong toxicity against Fusarium graminearum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–430 · show in text ↑
e1

“Control efficacy and treatment application of chemical and biological fungicide to corn ear rot were comprehensive evaluated.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–302 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiophanate-methyl showed strong toxicity against Fusarium verticillioides.

Treatment
Thiophanate-methyle0
Interactor
Fusarium verticillioidesFusarium verticillioidese0pathogen
Outcome
toxicity against Fusarium verticillioidese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium verticillioides
Fusarium verticillioides · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Thiophanate-methyl, Difenoconazole showed strong toxicity against Fusarium verticillioides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 432–522 · show in text ↑
e1

“Control efficacy and treatment application of chemical and biological fungicide to corn ear rot were comprehensive evaluated.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–302 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Difenoconazole showed strong toxicity against Fusarium verticillioides.

Treatment
Difenoconazolee0
Interactor
Fusarium verticillioidesFusarium verticillioidese0pathogen
Outcome
toxicity against Fusarium verticillioidese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium verticillioides
Fusarium verticillioides · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Thiophanate-methyl, Difenoconazole showed strong toxicity against Fusarium verticillioides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 432–522 · show in text ↑
e1

“Control efficacy and treatment application of chemical and biological fungicide to corn ear rot were comprehensive evaluated.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–302 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Iprodione had 92.3% field control efficacy.

Treatment
Iprodionee0
Outcome
control efficaciese0
Value
92.3%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the control efficacies of Iprodione and Jingangmeisu were 92.3% and 80.64%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 568–642 · show in text ↑
e1

“Control efficacy and treatment application of chemical and biological fungicide to corn ear rot were comprehensive evaluated.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–302 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Jingangmeisu had 80.64% field control efficacy.

Treatment
Jingangmeisue0
Outcome
control efficaciese0
Value
80.64%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the control efficacies of Iprodione and Jingangmeisu were 92.3% and 80.64%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 568–642 · show in text ↑
e1

“Control efficacy and treatment application of chemical and biological fungicide to corn ear rot were comprehensive evaluated.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–302 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying fungicides after inoculation controlled ear rot better than inoculation after spraying.

Treatment
spraying fungicides after inoculatione0
Outcome
control efficacye0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
inoculation after spraying fungicidese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“control efficacy of spraying fungicides after inoculation, was better than that of inoculation after spraying fungicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–768 · show in text ↑
e1

“Control efficacy and treatment application of chemical and biological fungicide to corn ear rot were comprehensive evaluated.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–302 · show in text ↑

fungicide · control · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 7 positive, 3 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

inoculation · control · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

application · control · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

15 papers: 15 positive, 0 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.