Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The 500 ppm chitosan dose gave better protection than 1000 ppm in all tested fruits.

A claim from Does Chitosan Extend the Shelf Life of Fruits? · 2016

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 500 ppm chitosan dose gave better protection than 1000 ppm in all tested fruits.

Taxon
bananae1
Treatment
500 ppm of chitosan spraye0
Outcome
protectione0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
1000 ppme0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“500 ppm of chitosan spray gave better protection than 1000 ppm in all the tested fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1286–1373
e1

“banana (cvs. Shabri and Champa), strawberry, tomato, and oranges”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 597–661

Title

Does Chitosan Extend the Shelf Life of Fruits?

Tahsin Islam Sakif; Adam Dobriansky; Kelly Russell; et al. Advances in Bioscience and Biotechnology 2016. doi:10.4236/abb.2016.78032

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-e3610df7f96c43ff0f4eebaf29a23aea195773ee1e50057427b0ad06a6698851 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

application · control · MusaPositive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.