Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The maximum grain yield of 23.48 q/ha was obtained with 60 cm row spacing.

A claim from Effect of row spacing, nitrogen and weed control on growth, yield and nutrient uptake of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) · 2005

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Taxon: sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment: 60 cm row spacinge1
Outcome: grain yielde1
Direction: maximume1
Value: 23.48 q/hae1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

*Sorghum* · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1
“The maximum grain yield was obtained with 60 cm row spacing (23.48 q/ha)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 349–421

t0
“sorghum (Sorghum bicolor)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–114

Title

Effect of row spacing, nitrogen and weed control on growth, yield and nutrient uptake of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor)

U. K. Kaushik; Shaktawat Indian Journal of Agronomy 2005

Other claims from this paper (5)

Intervention effect Row spacing had no significant influence on growth parameters or nutrient uptake of sorghum.
Intervention effect There was no significant difference in sorghum yield between 60 and 80 cm row spacing.
Intervention effect Application of 80 kg N/ha significantly increased grain yield and total N uptake by crop and weeds.
Intervention effect Total P uptake was significantly increased with nitrogen up to 120 kg N/ha.
Intervention effect Atrazine at 0.5 kg a.i./ha plus one hoeing at 35 days significantly increased yields and N and P uptake compared with atrazine alone.

Record rev-e3694540ebe181712edfa2ef004de07e3ec7a759d8954756c63cc5bf96266a7b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

density · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

98 papers: 83 positive, 15 negative or no effect

82 papers in the same direction as this claim · 14 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

no effect
seeding rate did not significantly affect ethanol yield.
Agronomic Practices for Production of Ethanol from Sweet Sorghum · 1991
Opposite direction
no effect
Seeding rate had no significant effect on forage dry matter accumulation.
Seeding rate effects on forage productivity and nutritive value of sorghum · 2021
Opposite direction
no effect
Row spacing at constant population did not affect panicle numbers.
Plant Population, Rainfall and Sorghum Production in Botswana. I. Results of Experiment Station Trials · 1987 · compared with constant population
Opposite direction
no effect
Reducing row spacing from 70 to 45 cm had hardly any positive effect on yield.
Effect of Soil Moisture Regime and Row Spacing on Grain Sorghum Production¹ · 1969
Opposite direction
no effect
In the earliest flowering cultivar Texas (610SR), row spacing had no significant effect on yield.
Effects of row spacing on growth and grain yield of early and late sorghum cultivars · 1988
Opposite direction
negative
High density and intercropping decreased sorghum yield.
Effect of plant densities and cropping systems on yield components of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.) genotypes and sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench.) · 2010 · compared with sole crop
Opposite direction
negative
Both wet and dry matter forage yield declined linearly as planting density increased.
Effects of row spacing and planting density of forage sorghum on dry matter yield, morphologic parameters, nutritive value, and predicted milk yield of dairy cows · 2021
Opposite direction
no effect
Plant density had no effect on yield.
Structure of yield in hybrid, high-bred and local sorghums as influenced by nitrogen and population levels · 1975
Opposite direction

89 papers more in this group

See all 98 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.

Other papers on the same question

density · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results