Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Tissue samples taken within five weeks of planting had higher Mn concentration with the acidic NH4NO3-MCP-KCl fertilizer than with the basic urea-DAP-KCl fertilizer.

A claim from Effect of Fertilizer Reaction and Placement on Availability of Manganese1 · 1980

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tissue samples taken within five weeks of planting had higher Mn concentration with the acidic NH4NO3-MCP-KCl fertilizer than with the basic urea-DAP-KCl fertilizer.

Organ / stage
Tissue samplese2
Treatment
NH 4 NO 3 ‐MCP‐KCl (acidic) fertilizere2
Outcome
Mn concentratione2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
urea‐DAP‐KCl (basic) fertilizere2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“A series of laboratory incubation, greenhouse, and field studies were conducted to evaluate fertilizer reaction and Mn sources on availability of Mn to sugarbeets ( Beta vulgaris L.), soybeans ( Glycine max L.) and navy beans ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 318–568
e2

“Tissue samples taken within five weeks of planting had higher Mn concentration for a NH 4 NO 3 ‐MCP‐KCl (acidic) fertilizer than for the urea‐DAP‐KCl (basic) fertilizer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2030–2199

Title

Effect of Fertilizer Reaction and Placement on Availability of Manganese1

R. D. Voth; D. R. Christenson Agronomy Journal 1980. doi:10.2134/agronj1980.00021962007200050019x

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-e38e5f68c6dde73288c6d38ede97e3f1b158e6dcb21b9d8d42aa98a2834c3887 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 11 in the model’s answer

fertilization · nutrient: content · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

59 papers: 46 positive, 13 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this claim · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

50 papers more in this group

See all 59 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.