Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Leaf N concentrations of white clover increased with sulphur or sulphate applications.

A claim from RELATIONS BETWEEN NUTRIENT CONCENTRATIONS IN PLANT TISSUES AND RESPONSES OF WHITE CLOVER TO FERTILISERS ON AGLEY PODZOL NEAR WESTPORT · 1970

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf N concentrations of white clover increased with sulphur or sulphate applications.

Taxon
white cloverTrifolium repenst0
Organ / stage
white clover leavese0
Treatment
sulphur, or sulphatee0
Outcome
N concentrationse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N concentrations in white clover leaves (blades plus petiole) increased with increasing rates of mono­ calcium phosphate, lime, sulphur, or sulphate, and with molybdenum applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–1060
t0

“WHITE CLOVER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–88

Title

RELATIONS BETWEEN NUTRIENT CONCENTRATIONS IN PLANT TISSUES AND RESPONSES OF WHITE CLOVER TO FERTILISERS ON AGLEY PODZOL NEAR WESTPORT

Nussbaum Jl 1970

Other claims from this paper (19)

Record rev-e394bcdf531a6da40da1194997e47487545d202a5cfd43193356a87341dbd3f0 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 11 in the model’s answer

sulfur atom · nutrient: content · Trifolium repens (white clover)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

sulfate · nutrient: content · Trifolium repens (white clover)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.