Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The highest catalyst boron rate did not reduce seedling top growth.

A claim from Comparison of a Spent Boron‐phosphate Catalyst with Sodium Borate as a Source of Boron for Cotton1 · 1972

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest catalyst boron rate did not reduce seedling top growth.

Treatment
7.5 ppm Be0
Outcome
seedling top growthe0
Direction
No reductione0
Qualifier
any soile0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No reduction in seedling top growth was obtained on any soil at 7.5 ppm B, the highest rate of NSC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–679
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–97

Title

Comparison of a Spent Boron‐phosphate Catalyst with Sodium Borate as a Source of Boron for Cotton1

D. E. Lewis; John I. Wear Agronomy Journal 1972. doi:10.2134/agronj1972.00021962006400050004x

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-e397a5d556c5d6dd57ea7117f4608845b925f286ee618842c0f6359f79797e24 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

boron atom · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

22 papers: 20 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
    Boron deficiency decreased cotton leaf area.

    Carbohydrate production and transport in cotton cultivars grown under boron deficiency · 2013

    Opposite directionAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive
    Boron deficiency impaired cotton growth.

    Compared boron uptake and translocation in cotton cultivars · 2012

    Opposite directionAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

13 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.