Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Full irrigation with 100% RDF of NPK maintained 30% higher yield than reduced water supply at the same fertilizer rate.

A claim from RESPONSE OF YIELD AND QUALITY OF TOMATO GROWN IN UNHEATED GREENHOUSE TO IRRIGATION AND FERTILIZATION WITH DIFFERENT RATES · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full irrigation with 100% RDF of NPK maintained 30% higher yield than reduced water supply at the same fertilizer rate.

Treatment
Full irrigatione0
Outcome
yield of tomatoe0
Direction
highere0
Value
30%e0
Qualifier
100% RDF of NPKe0
Comparator
reduced water supplye0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Full irrigation, in interaction with the fertilization rates 120 % and 100% RDF of NPK, maintained 30% higher yield of tomato than the yield of plants under reduced water supply with the same fertilization rates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–743
t0

“TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–39

Title

RESPONSE OF YIELD AND QUALITY OF TOMATO GROWN IN UNHEATED GREENHOUSE TO IRRIGATION AND FERTILIZATION WITH DIFFERENT RATES

Galina PATAMANSKA; Ivanka MITOVA; Daniela MITEVA; et al. The Journal Agriculture and Forestry 2021. doi:10.17707/agricultforest.67.4.04

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-e3c1be7a4d2e52c1d1290fd691da5a222db4b5d8def964e9757a3e91a9be46b5 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

344 papers: 239 positive, 105 negative or no effect

238 papers in the same direction as this claim · 98 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

335 papers more in this group

See all 344 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.