Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Limiting N supply promoted bolting in cauliflower.

A claim from Response of yield and quality of cauliflower varieties (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis) to nitrogen supply · 1999

Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Limiting N supply promoted bolting in cauliflower.

Treatment
limiting N supplye7
Outcome
boltinge7
Direction
promotede7

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“indicating that limiting N supply promoted the process of bolting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1436–1501
e2

“such as cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 61–114

Title

Response of yield and quality of cauliflower varieties (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis) to nitrogen supply

Karin Rather; M. K. Schenk; A. P. Everaarts; et al. The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology 1999. doi:10.1080/14620316.1999.11511169

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-e3ca252b89ef489e38f9c0b42bf1177d5c171bd672659fb6ec5a5b325da00bd7 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

nitrogen · phenology · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 11 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    No nitrogen delayed broccoli head maturity by five days relative to other applied rates.

    Broccoli growth in response to increasing rates of pre-plant nitrogen. I. Yield and quality · 2009 · compared with the other rates of applied N

    Opposite directionCites this paperAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.