Intervention effectmodel-written summary

T18 gave the best fruit set per cluster, 8.07.

A claim from Effect of Plant Growth Regulators on the Growth, Yield and Quality of Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T18 gave the best fruit set per cluster, 8.07.

Taxon
Solanum lycopersicumSolanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment
GA3@90ppm + NAA@45ppme0
Outcome
fruit set per clustere1
Direction
beste0
Value
8.07e1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–102
e0

“significant results were showen by T18 (GA3@90ppm + NAA@45ppm) best in terms of plant height (123.93 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 615–719
e1

“fruit set per cluster (8.07)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–902

Title

Effect of Plant Growth Regulators on the Growth, Yield and Quality of Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)

Mayank Madhav; Deepanshu; Vijay Bahadur International Journal of Environment and Climate Change 2023. doi:10.9734/ijecc/2023/v13i92498

Other claims from this paper (15)

Record rev-e405f930bcdcbe8cd05f11b990f2f5ee1115e107ff1798bf135653919a8d432f · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

23 papers: 21 positive, 2 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Gibberellic acid · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

56 papers: 51 positive, 5 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

47 papers more in this group

See all 56 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.