Intervention effectmodel-written summary

CO2 elevation generally did not significantly enhance size-specific growth rate.

A claim from Effects of elevated CO 2 on the size structure in even‐aged monospecific stands of Chenopodium album · 2003

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CO2 elevation generally did not significantly enhance size-specific growth rate.

Taxon
Chenopodium albumChenopodium albumt0
Treatment
CO 2 elevatione0
Outcome
growth rate as a function of plant sizee0
Direction
did not significantly enhancee0
Qualifier
except for the high nutrient stand at the earliest stagee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album · TaxonOlivier Pichard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The CO 2 elevation did not significantly enhance the growth rate as a function of plant size except for the high nutrient stand at the earliest stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1142–1291
t0

“Chenopodium album”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–100

Title

Effects of elevated CO 2 on the size structure in even‐aged monospecific stands of Chenopodium album

HISAE NAGASHIMA; TAKASHI YAMANO; KOUKI HIKOSAKA; et al. Global Change Biology 2003. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00623.x

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-e41e54583ff4e1796ad89f4144a61065ed0ba43026902c6001058ec2e85beab1 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

co2 · growth · Chenopodium album (common lambsquarters)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. no effect
See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.