Claim · model-written summary
Anatomical comparison indicated physical inhibitors did not affect BVA rooting capacity.
- Taxon
- Berberis vulgaris var. asperma
Berberis vulgarise1 - Outcome
- rooting capacitye0
- Qualifier
- physical inhibitorse0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionValue
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“physical inhibitors did not affect the rooting capacity of BVA”
e1“Berberis vulgaris var. asperma (BVA)”
Title
Ali Tehranifar; Saeed Mahmoody Tabar; Yahya Selahvarzi; et al. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research 2014. doi:10.5424/sjar/2014122-3889
Other claims from this paper (13)
- Observation BTA cuttings rooted whereas BVA cuttings did not.
- Observation BVA cuttings did not root.
- Intervention effect IBA increased rooting percentage, root number and root length in BTA relative to control.
- Intervention effect IBA+H2O2 increased rooting percentage, root number and root length in BTA relative to control.
- Intervention effect IBA+H2O2 gave the lowest peroxidase activity after planting in BTA.
- Intervention effect IBA+H2O2 gave the highest peroxidase activity in BTA at 50 days.
- Intervention effect BVA peroxidase activity did not differ significantly among treatments through 80 days.
- Intervention effect BTA control cuttings had lower PPO activity than other treatments.
- Observation PPO activity in treated cuttings rose from 0 to 50 days.
- Observation PPO activity in treated cuttings decreased slightly from 60 to 80 days.
- Observation BVA had significantly lower PPO activity than BTA during rooting.
- Observation BTA treated with IBA and IBA+H2O2 had the highest phenolic compound content.
- Observation BVA cuttings had higher total sugars than BTA early in root formation.