Intervention effectmodel-written summary

SCFT increased nitrogen use efficiency by 16.86–26.47 %.

A claim from Biogas slurry topdressing as replacement of chemical fertilizers boosts water and nitrogen use efficiency and yield in semiarid rainfed field crops · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SCFT increased nitrogen use efficiency by 16.86–26.47 %.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
SCFTt1
Outcome
nitrogen use efficiencye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
16.86–26.47 %e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These changes increased crop yield, water-use efficiency, and nitrogen use efficiency by 16.86–26.47 %, 4–6 kg/(ha·mm) and 16.86–26.47 %, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1614–1765
t0

“a maize field experiment was conducted in Shanxi Province”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 497–554
t1

“SCFT could significantly promote the growth and development of maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1234–1302

Title

Biogas slurry topdressing as replacement of chemical fertilizers boosts water and nitrogen use efficiency and yield in semiarid rainfed field crops

Haitao Wang; Xiaoyang Liang; Xiaokun Feng; et al. Agricultural Water Management 2025. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2025.109725

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-e49c2f7d41aadff5d5185176dbefb465cd45ec1340cc00abd8b3a2cfba74c86c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 10 in the model’s answer

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

189 papers: 174 positive, 15 negative or no effect

173 papers in the same direction as this claim · 12 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

180 papers more in this group

See all 189 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.