Paper · 2025 · Agricultural Water Management

Biogas slurry topdressing as replacement of chemical fertilizers boosts water and nitrogen use efficiency and yield in semiarid rainfed field crops

Haitao Wang; Xiaoyang Liang; Xiaokun Feng; et al.

12
claims
27
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Biogas slurry (BS) is used as an organic liquid fertilizer for basal fertilization in semiarid regions. However, a single fertilization with basal fertilizer may reduce water and nitrogen use efficiency, which could negatively affect overall crop yield. This study proposes an innovative approach to enhance the water and nitrogen use efficiency and crop yield in semiarid areas by substituting chemical fertilizers with BS topdressing (SCFT). Based on the premise of equal nitrogen substitution, a maize field experiment was conducted in Shanxi Province, a typical semiarid region of China, using five concentrations of biogas slurry as nitrogen fertilizer (substitution ratios=0 %, 25 %, 50 %, 75 %, and 100 %) for topdressing. Quantified measurements of soil water and nitrogen content, crop physiological growth indicators, and yield in 2021 and 2022.The results showed that the soil moisture content was significantly increased within 5 %, and the content of ammonium nitrogen and nitrate nitrogen in maize root layer was also increased in the short term after topdressing. However, ammonium nitrogen content tends to align with soil moisture content, and significant changes will occur only in the short term after topdressing. SCFT could significantly promote the growth and development of maize, especially with 100 % is used, which showed the most significant effects. Compared to pure chemical fertilizer, SCFT increased plant height, diameter and leaf area index by approximately 10 %, and improved SPAD value, dry matter quality, and nitrogen uptake by approximately 50 %, 30 % and 20 %, respectively. These changes increased crop yield, water-use efficiency, and nitrogen use efficiency by 16.86–26.47 %, 4–6 kg/(ha·mm) and 16.86–26.47 %, respectively. SCFT can improve water and nitrogen use efficiency as well as crop yield in semiarid regions, and the positive effects of SCFT were demonstrated to have an annual cumulative impact. • Applying BS topdressing is a new technique in organic fertilizer management. • Substituting chemical fertilizers with BS topdressing can enhance yield and improve water and nitrogen use efficiency. • Substituting chemical fertilizers with BS topdressing increased soil moisture content in the main root zone. • Substituting chemical fertilizers with BS topdressing prolongs the growth cycle of maize. • Substituting chemical fertilizers with BS topdressing exhibits an annual cumulative effect.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biogas slurry topdressing significantly raised soil moisture within 5 %.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Biogas slurry topdressingt0
Outcome
soil moisture contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
5 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the soil moisture content was significantly increased within 5 %, and the content of ammonium nitrogen and nitrate nitrogen in maize root layer was also increased in the short term after topdressing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–1078 · show in text ↑
t0

“Biogas slurry topdressing as replacement of chemical fertilizers boosts water and nitrogen use efficiency and yield in semiarid rainfed field crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–147 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biogas slurry topdressing increased root-zone ammonium and nitrate nitrogen shortly after application.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
topdressinge0
Outcome
content of ammonium nitrogen and nitrate nitrogen in maize root layere0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
in the short terme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the content of ammonium nitrogen and nitrate nitrogen in maize root layer was also increased in the short term after topdressing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1078 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize growth and development were significantly promoted by SCFT, especially at 100 %.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
SCFTe0
Outcome
growth and developmente0
Direction
promotee0
Qualifier
100 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SCFT could significantly promote the growth and development of maize, especially with 100 % is used, which showed the most significant effects.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1234–1377 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SCFT increased plant height, diameter and leaf area index by about 10 % versus chemical fertilizer.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
SCFTe0
Outcome
plant height, diameter and leaf area indexe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
approximately 10 %e0
Comparator
pure chemical fertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to pure chemical fertilizer, SCFT increased plant height, diameter and leaf area index by approximately 10 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1378–1495 · show in text ↑
t0

“a maize field experiment was conducted in Shanxi Province”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 497–554 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SCFT improved SPAD value by about 50 %.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
SCFTt1
Outcome
SPAD valuee0
Direction
improvede0
Value
approximately 50 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“improved SPAD value, dry matter quality, and nitrogen uptake by approximately 50 %, 30 % and 20 %, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1501–1613 · show in text ↑
t0

“a maize field experiment was conducted in Shanxi Province”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 497–554 · show in text ↑
t1

“SCFT could significantly promote the growth and development of maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1234–1302 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SCFT improved dry matter quality by about 30 %.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
SCFTt1
Outcome
dry matter qualitye0
Direction
improvede0
Value
30 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“improved SPAD value, dry matter quality, and nitrogen uptake by approximately 50 %, 30 % and 20 %, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1501–1613 · show in text ↑
t0

“a maize field experiment was conducted in Shanxi Province”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 497–554 · show in text ↑
t1

“SCFT could significantly promote the growth and development of maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1234–1302 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SCFT improved nitrogen uptake by about 20 %.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
SCFTt1
Outcome
nitrogen uptakee0
Direction
improvede0
Value
20 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“improved SPAD value, dry matter quality, and nitrogen uptake by approximately 50 %, 30 % and 20 %, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1501–1613 · show in text ↑
t0

“a maize field experiment was conducted in Shanxi Province”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 497–554 · show in text ↑
t1

“SCFT could significantly promote the growth and development of maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1234–1302 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SCFT increased crop yield by 16.86–26.47 %.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
SCFTt1
Outcome
crop yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
16.86–26.47 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These changes increased crop yield, water-use efficiency, and nitrogen use efficiency by 16.86–26.47 %, 4–6 kg/(ha·mm) and 16.86–26.47 %, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1614–1765 · show in text ↑
t0

“a maize field experiment was conducted in Shanxi Province”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 497–554 · show in text ↑
t1

“SCFT could significantly promote the growth and development of maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1234–1302 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SCFT increased water-use efficiency by 4–6 kg/(ha·mm).

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
SCFTt1
Outcome
water-use efficiencye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
4–6 kg/(ha·mm)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These changes increased crop yield, water-use efficiency, and nitrogen use efficiency by 16.86–26.47 %, 4–6 kg/(ha·mm) and 16.86–26.47 %, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1614–1765 · show in text ↑
t0

“a maize field experiment was conducted in Shanxi Province”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 497–554 · show in text ↑
t1

“SCFT could significantly promote the growth and development of maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1234–1302 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SCFT increased nitrogen use efficiency by 16.86–26.47 %.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
SCFTt1
Outcome
nitrogen use efficiencye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
16.86–26.47 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These changes increased crop yield, water-use efficiency, and nitrogen use efficiency by 16.86–26.47 %, 4–6 kg/(ha·mm) and 16.86–26.47 %, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1614–1765 · show in text ↑
t0

“a maize field experiment was conducted in Shanxi Province”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 497–554 · show in text ↑
t1

“SCFT could significantly promote the growth and development of maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1234–1302 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The positive effects of SCFT accumulated annually.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
annual cumulative impacte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the positive effects of SCFT were demonstrated to have an annual cumulative impact.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1864–1947 · show in text ↑
t0

“a maize field experiment was conducted in Shanxi Province”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 497–554 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biogas slurry topdressing prolonged the maize growth cycle.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
BS topdressinge0
Outcome
growth cyclee0
Direction
prolongse0
Comparator
chemical fertilizerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Substituting chemical fertilizers with BS topdressing prolongs the growth cycle of maize.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2261–2350 · show in text ↑

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

189 papers: 174 positive, 15 negative or no effect

173 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

185 papers more in this group

See all 189 papers →

fertilization · physiology: water · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

93 papers: 83 positive, 10 negative or no effect

82 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

89 papers more in this group

See all 93 papers →

fertilization · quality: general · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

103 papers: 86 positive, 17 negative or no effect

85 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

99 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

fertilization · quality: grain · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

106 papers: 89 positive, 17 negative or no effect

88 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

102 papers more in this group

See all 106 papers →

fertilization · physiology: pigments · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

171 papers: 157 positive, 14 negative or no effect

156 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

167 papers more in this group

See all 171 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,164 papers: 1,026 positive, 138 negative or no effect

1,025 papers in the same direction as this paper · 127 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1,160 papers more in this group

See all 1,164 papers →

fertilization · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,365 papers: 1,196 positive, 169 negative or no effect

1,195 papers in the same direction as this paper · 149 in the opposite direction · 20 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

1,361 papers more in this group

See all 1,365 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.