Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Plantlet regeneration of Lilium ledebourii was highest (91.66%) on medium with 0.5 mg/L NAA and 1.5 mg/L BA.

A claim from Plant Regeneration from Protoplasts of Lilium ledebourii (Baker) Boiss · 2014

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plantlet regeneration of Lilium ledebourii was highest (91.66%) on medium with 0.5 mg/L NAA and 1.5 mg/L BA.

Taxon
Lilium ledebouriiLilium ledebouriit0
Treatment
0.5 mg L -1 NAA, 1.5 mg L -1 BAe3
Outcome
plantlet regeneratione3
Direction
higheste3
Value
91.66%e3

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lilium ledebourii
Lilium ledebourii · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorypeganum from Small Dole, England · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lilium ledebourii”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–56
e3

“The highest plantlet regeneration (91.66%) was obtained by using a medium containing 0.5 mg L -1 NAA, 1.5 mg L -1 BA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1114–1230

Title

Plant Regeneration from Protoplasts of Lilium ledebourii (Baker) Boiss

Seyyed Karim Tahami; Esmaeil Chamani; Nasser Zare Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology 2014

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-e4c2a8e9343b86dab85de3ee9bf6776c5600fc4aa1fda3dcccaa8c0a67ab7418 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

N-benzyladenine · growth · Lilium ledebouriiResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · growth · Lilium ledebouriiResults agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.