Paper · 2015 · Majallah-i 'ulūm-i dānishgāh-i Tihrān

Effects of liquid, temporary immersion bioreactor and solid culture systems on micropropagation of Lilium ledebourii via bulblet microscales— An endangered valuable plant with ornamental potential

Masoud Mirmasoumi; Mehdi Bakhshaie

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Lilium ledebourii (Baker) Boiss. (Liliaceae) is a critically endangered lily species native tonorthern Iran, where it is protected by law. In order to develop a cost effective method for largescalepropagation, the effects of three culture systems (solid, liquid and temporary immersion)and two types of cytokinins [6-Benzyladenine (BA) and Thidiazuron (TDZ)] were studied onthe in vitro plant regeneration of L. ledebourii. To establish the protocol, we used in vitroregenerated bulblets obtained from bulb scale segments that were cultured on solid Murashigeand Skoog (MS) media as starting material. The bulblet microscale transverse thin cell layerswere cultured on MS solid medium containing 3% sucrose and different combinations of plantgrowth regulators. Choice of both, the culture system and the type of cytokinin, affected thedifferentiation of explants. Two types of calli formed on explants: type I callus wasembryogenic, while type II callus was shoot organogenesis. The highest percentage (94%) ofembryogenic callus was obtained when calli were transferred on MS solid media supplementedwith 0.54 μM α-Naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA) and 0.44 μM BA. In addition, it was alsoobserved that the use of temporary immersion bioreactor resulted in a significantly loweramount of shoot organogenesis rather than solid culture systems. Seventy percent of theplantlets were successfully acclimatized to ex–vitro conditions and were phenotypically similarto the mother plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both the culture system and the type of cytokinin affected the differentiation of Lilium ledebourii explants.

Taxon
Lilium ledebouriiLilium ledebouriit0
Treatment
the culture system and the type of cytokinine0
Outcome
differentiation of explantse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lilium ledebourii
Lilium ledebourii · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorypeganum from Small Dole, England · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Choice of both, the culture system and the type of cytokinin, affected the differentiation of explants”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 761–862 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lilium ledebourii”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–116 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two types of calli formed on explants: type I was embryogenic and type II was shoot organogenesis.

Taxon
Lilium ledebouriiLilium ledebouriit0
Outcome
Two types of calli formed on explantse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lilium ledebourii
Lilium ledebourii · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorypeganum from Small Dole, England · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two types of calli formed on explants: type I callus wasembryogenic, while type II callus was shoot organogenesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 864–977 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lilium ledebourii”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest percentage (94%) of embryogenic callus was obtained on MS solid medium supplemented with 0.54 μM NAA and 0.44 μM BA.

Taxon
Lilium ledebouriiLilium ledebouriit0
Treatment
MS solid media supplementedwith 0.54 μM α-Naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA) and 0.44 μM BAe0
Outcome
embryogenic calluse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
94%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lilium ledebourii
Lilium ledebourii · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorypeganum from Small Dole, England · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest percentage (94%) ofembryogenic callus was obtained when calli were transferred on MS solid media supplementedwith 0.54 μM α-Naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA) and 0.44 μM BA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1158 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lilium ledebourii”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The temporary immersion bioreactor gave a significantly lower amount of shoot organogenesis than solid culture systems.

Taxon
Lilium ledebouriiLilium ledebouriit0
Treatment
temporary immersion bioreactore0
Outcome
shoot organogenesise0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
solid culture systemse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lilium ledebourii
Lilium ledebourii · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorypeganum from Small Dole, England · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the use of temporary immersion bioreactor resulted in a significantly loweramount of shoot organogenesis rather than solid culture systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1198–1336 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lilium ledebourii”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–116 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seventy percent of the plantlets were successfully acclimatized to ex-vitro conditions.

Taxon
Lilium ledebouriiLilium ledebouriit0
Outcome
successfully acclimatized to ex–vitro conditionse0
Value
Seventy percente0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lilium ledebourii
Lilium ledebourii · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorypeganum from Small Dole, England · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seventy percent of theplantlets were successfully acclimatized to ex–vitro conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1338–1423 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lilium ledebourii”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–116 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The acclimatized plantlets were phenotypically similar to the mother plants.

Taxon
Lilium ledebouriiLilium ledebouriit0
Outcome
phenotypically similarto the mother plantse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lilium ledebourii
Lilium ledebourii · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorypeganum from Small Dole, England · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“were phenotypically similarto the mother plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1428–1475 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lilium ledebourii”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–116 · show in text ↑

N-benzyladenine · growth · Lilium ledebouriiResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · growth · Lilium ledebouriiResults agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

in vitro · growth · Lilium ledebouriiPositive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.