Claim · model-written summary
Constant high temperature and high temperature only during the light period showed no marked difference.
- Taxon
- Tobacco Plant
Nicotiana tabacumt0 - Treatment
- high temperature only for the light periode0
- Outcome
- responsee0
- Direction
- No marked differencee0
- Comparator
- costant high temperaturee0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Tobacco Plant”
e0“No marked difference in response was recognized between the plant under the costant high temperature and that under the high temperature only for the light period.”
Title
Developmental Response of Tobacco Plant to Temperature in Relation to Photoperiodic Condition
Yozo MURAOKA; Kazunobu Ohori Japanese Journal of Crop Science 1956. doi:10.1626/jcs.24.271
Other claims from this paper (9)
- Observation Constant temperature produced the earliest flower bud initiation in the first experiment.
- Observation Low temperature during the light period produced the next earliest flower bud initiation.
- Observation High temperature during the dark period gave the latest flower bud initiation.
- Observation Low temperature accelerated development regardless of day length.
- Observation At high temperature, at least 12 hours of light decidedly retarded development.
- Observation At high temperature, development was less retarded under eight hours of light.
- Observation Low temperature during the dark period promoted development regardless of day length.
- Observation Eight hours of high temperature light followed by low temperature darkness reached flowering as rapidly as low temperature light or constant low temperature.
- Observation Similar regimes with more than eight hours of illumination retarded bud formation.