Intervention effectmodel-written summary

More tillage resulted in higher number of pods plant -1 (23).

A claim from Impact of tillage systems on growth and yield of Mungbean (Vigna radiata L., Wilczek) varieties under dryland condition · 2015

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

More tillage resulted in higher number of pods plant -1 (23).

Taxon
Mungbean (Vigna radiata L., Wilczek)Vigna radiatat0
Treatment
Increase in number of tillagee0
Outcome
number of pods plant -1e0
Direction
highere0
Value
23e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Mungbean (Vigna radiata L., Wilczek)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–85
e0

“Increase in number of tillage had resulted in significantly higher number of seedlings m -2 (24), early emergence (6 days), minimum number of branches plant -1 (4), taller plants (66 cm), higher number of pods plant -1` (23), higher biological (2023 kg ha -1 ) and grain yield (402 kg ha - 1 ).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–1040

Title

Impact of tillage systems on growth and yield of Mungbean (Vigna radiata L., Wilczek) varieties under dryland condition

Aman ullah Pure and Applied Biology 2015. doi:10.19045/bspab.2015.43009

Other claims from this paper (14)

Record rev-e4f22edbb0f7a9dba970d0e561640d2a3f210899a5d97fafbd18c7a5243b8eba · schema claims-v0.9 · position 12 in the model’s answer

tillage · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

81 papers: 67 positive, 14 negative or no effect

66 papers in the same direction as this claim · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

72 papers more in this group

See all 81 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.