Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Cropping system had no significant effect on forage yield and nutritive value.

A claim from Predicting Nutritional Quality of Dual-Purpose Cowpea Using NIRS and the Impacts of Crop Management · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cropping system had no significant effect on forage yield and nutritive value.

Treatment
cropping systeme0
Outcome
forage yield and nutritive valuee0
Direction
no significant effecte0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cropping system had no significant effect on cowpea forage yield and nutritive value”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2036–2120

Title

Predicting Nutritional Quality of Dual-Purpose Cowpea Using NIRS and the Impacts of Crop Management

Junior Bruno Ndiaye; Augustine K. Obour; Keith Harmoney; et al. Sustainability 2023. doi:10.3390/su151612155

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-e4f69788d90f13de79f47b3506f3434e8baffa5ce5878e33895047f5f2b32c07 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer

cultivation system · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.