Paper · 2023 · Open Access Journal of Agricultural Research

Selected Farming Systems for Improving Crop Production and RainWater Productivity in Semi-Arid Zone, Sudan

Muna M Elhag

14
claims
28
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The problem of water shortages for rainfed agricultural production is due to low rainfall and uneven distribution throughout the rainy season makes rainfed agriculture a highly risk enterprise. Appropriate farming systems and soil conservation measures are the only opportunity to reduce the high risk of crops yield losses. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of three farming systems; Conventional Farming (CF), Conservation Agriculture (CA), and in-field rain Water Harvesting (WH); on the yield and water productivity of sorghum, sesame and cowpea crops. Field experiments were conducted in semi-arid area of Sennar State, Sudan for two consecutive seasons (2015 and 2016). Three different planting machines were used. The CA recorded higher crop yield for sorghum (2594 kg/ha) followed by in-field rainwater Harvesting (WH) which gave 2362 kg/ha, while CF has the lowest crop yield (2072 kg/ha). For the sesame crop the WH gave the highest crop yield (740kg/ ha) followed by CA (718 kg/ha) and the lowest crop yield was obtained by CF (602 kg/ha). The highest cowpea crop yield was obtained by WH (927.kg/ha) followed by CA farming system (847 kg/ha) and the lowest crop yield was obtained by CF (785kg/ha). The CA farming system recorded the highest water productivity for sorghum (1.081 kg/m3) compared to the WH and CF, while the WH farming system recorded the highest water productivity (0.32 and 0.366 kg/m3) for sesame and cowpea respectively compared to the CA and CF. WH is best recommended farming system in semi-arid areas and CA the best recommended practice where annual rainfall is relatively high.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conservation agriculture gave higher sorghum yield than conventional farming.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume1
Treatment
CAe1
Outcome
crop yielde1
Direction
highere1
Value
2594 kg/hae1
Comparator
CFe1
Setting
Sennar State, Sudane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiments were conducted in semi-arid area of Sennar State, Sudan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–645 · show in text ↑
e1

“The CA recorded higher crop yield for sorghum (2594 kg/ha) followed by in-field rainwater Harvesting (WH) which gave 2362 kg/ha, while CF has the lowest crop yield (2072 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–912 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In-field water harvesting gave sorghum yield of 2362 kg/ha, ranked after conservation agriculture.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume1
Treatment
in-field rainwater Harvesting (WH)e1
Outcome
crop yielde1
Direction
followed bye1
Value
2362 kg/hae1
Comparator
CFe1
Setting
Sennar State, Sudane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiments were conducted in semi-arid area of Sennar State, Sudan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–645 · show in text ↑
e1

“The CA recorded higher crop yield for sorghum (2594 kg/ha) followed by in-field rainwater Harvesting (WH) which gave 2362 kg/ha, while CF has the lowest crop yield (2072 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–912 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional farming gave the lowest sorghum yield.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume1
Treatment
CFe1
Outcome
crop yielde1
Direction
loweste1
Value
2072 kg/hae1
Comparator
CAe1
Setting
Sennar State, Sudane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiments were conducted in semi-arid area of Sennar State, Sudan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–645 · show in text ↑
e1

“The CA recorded higher crop yield for sorghum (2594 kg/ha) followed by in-field rainwater Harvesting (WH) which gave 2362 kg/ha, while CF has the lowest crop yield (2072 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–912 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water harvesting gave the highest sesame yield, 740 kg/ha.

Treatment
WHe2
Outcome
crop yielde2
Direction
higheste2
Value
740kg/ hae2
Comparator
CFe2
Setting
Sennar State, Sudane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiments were conducted in semi-arid area of Sennar State, Sudan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–645 · show in text ↑
e2

“For the sesame crop the WH gave the highest crop yield (740kg/ ha) followed by CA (718 kg/ ha) and the lowest crop yield was obtained by CF (602 kg/ha)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 914–1064 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conservation agriculture gave sesame yield of 718 kg/ha, ranked after water harvesting.

Treatment
CAe2
Outcome
crop yielde2
Direction
followed bye2
Value
718 kg/ hae2
Comparator
WHe2
Setting
Sennar State, Sudane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiments were conducted in semi-arid area of Sennar State, Sudan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–645 · show in text ↑
e2

“For the sesame crop the WH gave the highest crop yield (740kg/ ha) followed by CA (718 kg/ ha) and the lowest crop yield was obtained by CF (602 kg/ha)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 914–1064 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional farming gave the lowest sesame yield, 602 kg/ha.

Treatment
CFe2
Outcome
crop yielde2
Direction
loweste2
Value
602 kg/hae2
Comparator
WHe2
Setting
Sennar State, Sudane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiments were conducted in semi-arid area of Sennar State, Sudan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–645 · show in text ↑
e2

“For the sesame crop the WH gave the highest crop yield (740kg/ ha) followed by CA (718 kg/ ha) and the lowest crop yield was obtained by CF (602 kg/ha)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 914–1064 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water harvesting gave the highest cowpea yield, 927.kg/ha.

Treatment
WHe3
Outcome
crop yielde3
Direction
higheste3
Value
927.kg/hae3
Comparator
CFe3
Setting
Sennar State, Sudane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiments were conducted in semi-arid area of Sennar State, Sudan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–645 · show in text ↑
e3

“The highest cowpea crop yield was obtained by WH (927.kg/ha) followed by CA farming system (847 kg/ha) and the lowest crop yield was obtained by CF (785kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1224 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conservation agriculture gave cowpea yield of 847 kg/ha, ranked after water harvesting.

Treatment
CA farming systeme3
Outcome
crop yielde3
Direction
followed bye3
Value
847 kg/hae3
Comparator
WHe3
Setting
Sennar State, Sudane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiments were conducted in semi-arid area of Sennar State, Sudan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–645 · show in text ↑
e3

“The highest cowpea crop yield was obtained by WH (927.kg/ha) followed by CA farming system (847 kg/ha) and the lowest crop yield was obtained by CF (785kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1224 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional farming gave the lowest cowpea yield, 785 kg/ha.

Treatment
CFe3
Outcome
crop yielde3
Direction
loweste3
Value
785kg/hae3
Comparator
WHe3
Setting
Sennar State, Sudane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiments were conducted in semi-arid area of Sennar State, Sudan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–645 · show in text ↑
e3

“The highest cowpea crop yield was obtained by WH (927.kg/ha) followed by CA farming system (847 kg/ha) and the lowest crop yield was obtained by CF (785kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1224 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conservation agriculture gave the highest sorghum water productivity, 1.081 kg/m3.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume4
Treatment
CA farming systeme4
Outcome
water productivitye4
Direction
higheste4
Value
1.081 kg/m3e4
Comparator
WH and CFe4
Setting
Sennar State, Sudane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiments were conducted in semi-arid area of Sennar State, Sudan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–645 · show in text ↑
e4

“The CA farming system recorded the highest water productivity for sorghum (1.081 kg/m3) compared to the WH and CF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1226–1339 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water harvesting gave the highest sesame water productivity, 0.32 kg/m3.

Treatment
WH farming systeme5
Outcome
water productivitye5
Direction
higheste5
Value
0.32e5
Comparator
CA and CFe5
Setting
Sennar State, Sudane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiments were conducted in semi-arid area of Sennar State, Sudan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–645 · show in text ↑
e5

“while the WH farming system recorded the highest water productivity (0.32 and 0.366 kg/m3) for sesame and cowpea respectively compared to the CA and CF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1341–1492 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water harvesting gave the highest cowpea water productivity, 0.366 kg/m3.

Treatment
WH farming systeme5
Outcome
water productivitye5
Direction
higheste5
Value
0.366e5
Comparator
CA and CFe5
Setting
Sennar State, Sudane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiments were conducted in semi-arid area of Sennar State, Sudan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–645 · show in text ↑
e5

“while the WH farming system recorded the highest water productivity (0.32 and 0.366 kg/m3) for sesame and cowpea respectively compared to the CA and CF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1341–1492 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Water harvesting is the best recommended farming system in semi-arid areas.

Taxon
sorghum, sesame and cowpeaVigna unguiculataSesamum indicumSorghume2
Outcome
best recommended farming systeme6
Setting
semi-arid arease6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“WH is best recommended farming system in semi-arid areas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1494–1550 · show in text ↑
e2

“the yield and water productivity of sorghum, sesame and cowpea crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–570 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Conservation agriculture is the best recommended practice where annual rainfall is relatively high.

Taxon
sorghum, sesame and cowpeaVigna unguiculataSesamum indicumSorghume2
Outcome
best recommended practicee7
Setting
where annual rainfall is relatively highe7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“CA the best recommended practice where annual rainfall is relatively high”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1555–1628 · show in text ↑
e2

“the yield and water productivity of sorghum, sesame and cowpea crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–570 · show in text ↑

tillage · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

35 papers: 27 positive, 8 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

tillage · yield · SorghumResults differ

123 papers: 102 positive, 21 negative or no effect

101 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

119 papers more in this group

See all 123 papers →

cultivation system · yield · Sesamum indicum (sesame)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

tillage · physiology: water · SorghumPositive and negative results

9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

cultivation system · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

cultivation system · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

11 papers: 8 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

tillage · yield · Sesamum indicum (sesame)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

rainfall · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

19 papers: 11 positive, 8 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.