Claim · model-written summary
Orobanche had higher acid-hydrolyzable and total carbohydrates than tomato hosts.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicume0 - Interactor
- Orobanche cernua
Orobanche cernuae0parasite - Outcome
- concentration of acid‐hydrolyzable and total carbohydrates in Orobanchee1
- Direction
- Highere1
- Comparator
- hoste1
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“tomato ( Lycopersicum esculentum Mill.) and mustard ( Brassica campestris L.) serving as hosts for Orobanche cernua and O. aegyptiaca respectively.”
e1“Higher concentration of acid‐hydrolyzable and total carbohydrates in Orobanche than in the host”
Title
JAGDISH NARAIN SINGH; TEJ BAHADUR RAI; JAI NARAIN SINGH Physiologia Plantarum 1972. doi:10.1111/j.1399-3054.1972.tb03626.x
Other claims from this paper (14)
- Intervention effect Orobanche infection raised total reducing and total sugar in tomato.
- Intervention effect Orobanche infection raised total reducing and total sugar in mustard.
- Intervention effect Orobanche infection decreased acid-hydrolyzable and total carbohydrates in tomato organs.
- Intervention effect Orobanche infection decreased acid-hydrolyzable and total carbohydrates in mustard organs.
- Mechanism The authors attributed host carbohydrate depletion to predominant hydrolytic activity.
- Intervention effect Infection depressed the sucrose proportion of total sugar in tomato.
- Intervention effect Infection depressed the sucrose proportion of total sugar in mustard.
- Mechanism The authors suggested hydrolysis dominance and slower synthesis explain the lower host sucrose proportion.
- Observation Orobanche had higher acid-hydrolyzable and total carbohydrates than mustard hosts.
- Mechanism The authors interpreted parasite carbohydrate enrichment as high sugar demand.
- Intervention effect Nitrogen fraction proportions did not differ significantly between healthy and infected tomato hosts.
- Intervention effect Nitrogen fraction proportions did not differ significantly between healthy and infected mustard hosts.
- Observation Orobanche had lower total soluble and total nitrogen concentrations than tomato host roots.
- Observation Orobanche had lower total soluble and total nitrogen concentrations than mustard host roots.