Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Combined soil and foliar micronutrient spray increased sorghum grain yield by 14.15 and 12.13% over soil and foliar application alone

A claim from Effect of micronutrient on yield and nutrient uptake in sorghum · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined soil and foliar micronutrient spray increased sorghum grain yield by 14.15 and 12.13% over soil and foliar application alone

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
combined soil+foliar spraye1
Outcome
graine1
Direction
significantly increasede1
Value
14.15 and 12.13%e1
Comparator
soil and foliar applicatione1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of micronutrient on yield and nutrient uptake in sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–63
e1

“methods of micronutrient application through combined soil+foliar spray significantly increased grain (14.15 and 12.13%), stover (10.75 and 8.60%) and biological yields (11.37 and 9.31%) over soil and foliar application, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 367–600

Title

Effect of micronutrient on yield and nutrient uptake in sorghum

SK Choudhary; MK Jat; A. K. Mathur Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 2017

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-e50f5a40098805849fc9550f3e53b6a56889ed1f54d06540e80d3758957f3790 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

application · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

88 papers: 81 positive, 7 negative or no effect

80 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. positive

79 papers more in this group

See all 88 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.