Paper · 2020 · Journal of Economic Entomology

Altering Planting Date to Manage Melanaphis sacchari (Hemiptera: Aphididae) Populations in Sweet Sorghum

Nathan H Mercer; John J Obrycki; Ricardo T Bessin

6
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Melanaphis sacchari Zehntner is a new pest of sweet sorghum in the United States, with the potential to cause complete crop failure. In Kentucky, sweet sorghum is normally planted in early May and harvested in late August or September. Planting sweet sorghum earlier in the season may avoid damaging levels of M. sacchari that develop in late summer. In a 2-yr field study, three different planting dates separated by a month (April, May, and June) were tested for their effect on M. sacchari densities and sweet sorghum yield. April (early) planted sweet sorghum was grown in greenhouses and transplanted to the field. May (mid) and June (late) planted sweet sorghum were direct seeded in the field. Melanaphis sacchari population densities were evaluated weekly starting in June. Sweet sorghum was harvested at the onset of the hard dough stage. Plots were split into two subplots, insecticide or noninsecticide, in the second year to control for planting date effect on yield. Early-planted sweet sorghum had lower aphid densities, but had lower yield relative to mid-planting date, which had the highest yield. Insecticide drenches in 2019 reduced cumulative aphid days in mid-plantings and late plantings, but did not significantly affect yield within planting dates. Seeding sweet sorghum earlier can reduce M. sacchari densities; however, this method alone may not provide the highest yields. We documented that the recommended planting date (May) for Kentucky produced the highest yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early planted sweet sorghum had lower aphid density.

Taxon
sweet sorghume0
Treatment
Early-plantede0
Outcome
aphid densitiese0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedInteractorComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Early-planted sweet sorghum had lower aphid densities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1033 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early planted sorghum yielded less than mid planted sorghum.

Taxon
sweet sorghume0
Treatment
Early-plantede0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
mid-planting datee0

Verbatim

e0

“Early-planted sweet sorghum had lower aphid densities, but had lower yield relative to mid-planting date”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1084 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mid planted sorghum had the highest yield.

Taxon
sweet sorghume1
Treatment
mid-planting datee0
Outcome
highest yielde0

Verbatim

e0

“mid-planting date, which had the highest yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1067–1113 · show in text ↑
e1

“sweet sorghum yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 507–526 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Insecticide drenches reduced cumulative aphid days in mid plantings.

Taxon
sweet sorghume1
Treatment
Insecticide drenchese0
Outcome
cumulative aphid dayse0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
mid-plantingse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Insecticide drenches in 2019 reduced cumulative aphid days in mid-plantings and late plantings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1115–1209 · show in text ↑
e1

“sweet sorghum yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 507–526 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Insecticide drenches reduced cumulative aphid days in late plantings.

Taxon
sweet sorghume1
Treatment
Insecticide drenchese0
Outcome
cumulative aphid dayse0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
late plantingse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Insecticide drenches in 2019 reduced cumulative aphid days in mid-plantings and late plantings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1115–1209 · show in text ↑
e1

“sweet sorghum yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 507–526 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Insecticide did not significantly affect yield within planting dates.

Taxon
sweet sorghume1
Treatment
Insecticide drenchese0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
did not significantly affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Insecticide drenches in 2019 reduced cumulative aphid days in mid-plantings and late plantings, but did not significantly affect yield within planting dates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1115–1271 · show in text ↑
e1

“sweet sorghum yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 507–526 · show in text ↑

insecticide · yield · SorghumResults differ

22 papers: 19 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

sowing time · pest · SorghumPositive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

sowing time · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

71 papers: 50 positive, 21 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 50 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

67 papers more in this group

See all 71 papers →

application · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

88 papers: 81 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 81 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

84 papers more in this group

See all 88 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.