Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Specialty fertilizer plus spraying 0.020 mg/L of BRs gave the maximum increment of the crown amplitude of Camellia oleifera.

A claim from Effect of Fertilization and BRs Application on Leaf Nutrition and Plant Growth of ‘Ganwu’ Clone of Camellia oleifera · 2012

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Specialty fertilizer plus spraying 0.020 mg/L of BRs gave the maximum increment of the crown amplitude of Camellia oleifera.

Taxon
Camellia oleiferaCamellia oleiferat0
Treatment
specialty fertilizer plus spraying 0.020 mg/L of BRse3
Outcome
increment of the crown amplitudee3
Direction
maximume3

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia oleifera
Camellia oleifera · TaxonUSDA Agricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Camellia oleifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–116
e3

“the maximum increment of the crown amplitude was got by applying the specialty fertilizer plus spraying 0.020 mg/L of BRs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–813

Title

Effect of Fertilization and BRs Application on Leaf Nutrition and Plant Growth of ‘Ganwu’ Clone of Camellia oleifera

Xiaomin Guo Xi'nan Linxueyuan xuebao 2012

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-e525c2a274177de585890272a1d828febdfbaf0146f769d0633365675f758557 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Camellia oleifera (tea-oil Camellia)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

application · molecular: metabolites · Camellia oleifera (tea-oil Camellia)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.