Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Bacterial isolates increased wheat root to shoot dry weight ratio by 88%.

A claim from The effect of plant growth promoting potentials of rhizosphere bacteria isolated from several halophytic species on vegetative growth and ionic content of wheat · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial isolates increased wheat root to shoot dry weight ratio by 88%.

Treatment
bacterial isolatese0
Outcome
root to shoot dry weight ratioe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
88e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All bacterial isolates also increased stem length, shoot and root dry weight, root to shoot dry weight ratio and total biomass by 17, 58.6, 137, 88 and 66 %, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1392–1562
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 155–160

Title

The effect of plant growth promoting potentials of rhizosphere bacteria isolated from several halophytic species on vegetative growth and ionic content of wheat

alireza Amini Hajiabadi; Central Office of Natural Resources; Watershed Management, Yazd, Iran; et al. Nova Biologica Reperta 2021. doi:10.52547/nbr.8.2.104

Other claims from this paper (14)

Record rev-e52bebd928dd7efe35c66732af879f8cb77e9e63e4387d694f3ebda779deaf3c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 14 in the model’s answer

inoculation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

532 papers: 476 positive, 56 negative or no effect

475 papers in the same direction as this claim · 55 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

523 papers more in this group

See all 532 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.