Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-applications increased yield by 2.3–21.6%.

Treatment
Co-A treatmentse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
2.3–21.6%e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The different Co-A treatments have shown a 0.2–23.7%, 3.6–26.7%, 2.3–21.6%, and 12.2–25.0% increase in various traits related to growth, physiology, yield, and WP, respectively, in comparison to the control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1328–1544
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 175–180

Title

Effects of Salicylic Acid and Macro- and Micronutrients through Foliar and Soil Applications on the Agronomic Performance, Physiological Attributes, and Water Productivity of Wheat under Normal and Limited Irrigation in Dry Climatic Conditions

Majed Alotaibi; Salah El-Hendawy; Nabil Mohammed; et al. Plants 2023. doi:10.3390/plants12122389

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-e52cff0e49f09d4930a535063f3152feeec8c64b9f14cd449cba7c9959869974 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

cobalt atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.