Paper · 2025 · Nitrogen

Optimizing Nitrogen and Water Use Efficiency in Wheat Cropping Systems Through Integrated Application of Biochar and Bokashi Under Different Irrigation Regimes

Gyanendra Dhakal; Takeshi Fujino; Srijana Thapa Magar; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Addressing the challenge of reducing environmental pollution from agricultural practices by improving nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) and water use efficiency (WUE) while ensuring high crop yields is essential for sustainable agriculture. Using a controlled glasshouse experiment, we evaluated the combined effects of biochar and bokashi under different irrigation regimes on NUE, WUE, and yield-related parameters in a wheat cropping system. The experiment followed a completely randomized design with three replications with four treatments: (1) control (C), (2) bokashi only (B0), (3) bokashi +1% biochar (B1), and (4) bokashi +2% biochar (B2). These treatments were evaluated at three irrigation levels—30% (IR30), 50% (IR50), and 60% (IR60) of field capacity (FC), resulting in a total of twelve treatments. Co-application of bokashi–biochar significantly (p < 0.050) improved grain yield (GY), straw yield (SY), total biomass (TB), total nitrogen uptake (TNU), grain protein content (GPC), NUE, and WUE, with the most notable benefits observed at 1% biochar application compared to C and B0 treatments. In addition, both types of treatment (bokashi and bokashi with biochar) and the level of irrigation had a significant impact on GY, SY, TB, TNU, GPC, NUE, and WUE. The B1 and B2 treatments further improved yield and efficiencies compared to bokashi alone. The positive correlation between grain yield and WUE underscores the importance of optimizing irrigation strategies alongside soil amendments for improved crop productivity. These enhancements in yield and efficiency are likely attributed to the increased soil fertility, nutrient availability, and water retention resulting from the combination of biochar and bokashi.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bokashi-biochar coapplication significantly improved grain yield, straw yield and total biomass, most notably with 1% biochar.

Treatment
Co-application of bokashi–biochare0
Outcome
grain yield (GY), straw yield (SY), total biomass (TB)e0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
1% biochar applicatione0
Comparator
C and B0 treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Co-application of bokashi–biochar significantly (p < 0.050) improved grain yield (GY), straw yield (SY), total biomass (TB), total nitrogen uptake (TNU), grain protein content (GPC), NUE, and WUE, with the most notable benefits observed at 1% biochar application compared to C and B0 treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–1105 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–439 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bokashi-biochar coapplication significantly improved total nitrogen uptake, grain protein content and nitrogen use efficiency.

Treatment
Co-application of bokashi–biochare0
Outcome
total nitrogen uptake (TNU), grain protein content (GPC), NUEe0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
C and B0 treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Co-application of bokashi–biochar significantly (p < 0.050) improved grain yield (GY), straw yield (SY), total biomass (TB), total nitrogen uptake (TNU), grain protein content (GPC), NUE, and WUE, with the most notable benefits observed at 1% biochar application compared to C and B0 treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–1105 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–439 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bokashi-biochar coapplication significantly improved water use efficiency.

Treatment
Co-application of bokashi–biochare0
Outcome
WUEe0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
C and B0 treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Co-application of bokashi–biochar significantly (p < 0.050) improved grain yield (GY), straw yield (SY), total biomass (TB), total nitrogen uptake (TNU), grain protein content (GPC), NUE, and WUE, with the most notable benefits observed at 1% biochar application compared to C and B0 treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–1105 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–439 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bokashi and irrigation level significantly affected wheat yield, biomass, nitrogen uptake, protein and use efficiencies.

Treatment
level of irrigatione0
Outcome
GY, SY, TB, TNU, GPC, NUE, and WUEe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both types of treatment (bokashi and bokashi with biochar) and the level of irrigation had a significant impact on GY, SY, TB, TNU, GPC, NUE, and WUE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1120–1269 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–439 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar with bokashi improved yield and efficiencies compared with bokashi alone.

Treatment
B1 and B2 treatmentse0
Outcome
yield and efficienciese0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
bokashi alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The B1 and B2 treatments further improved yield and efficiencies compared to bokashi alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1271–1361 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–439 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield and water use efficiency were positively correlated.

Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
positivee0
Comparator
WUEe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“positive correlation between grain yield and WUE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1367–1415 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–439 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attribute yield and efficiency gains to increased soil fertility, nutrient availability and water retention.

Treatment
combination of biochar and bokashie0
Outcome
enhancements in yield and efficiencye0
Qualifier
increased soil fertility, nutrient availability, and water retentione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These enhancements in yield and efficiency are likely attributed to the increased soil fertility, nutrient availability, and water retention resulting from the combination of biochar and bokashi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1537–1731 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–439 · show in text ↑

cobalt atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

cobalt atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

cobalt atom · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.