Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The Dargazi genotype on PyroDwarf rootstock had fruit yield of 4.95 kg per tree, 2.1 times higher than Beyrouti.

A claim from The rootstock type affecting fruit yield, and quality, and fire blight resistance of ‘Dargazi’ and ‘Beyrouti’ pear genotypes · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Dargazi genotype on PyroDwarf rootstock had fruit yield of 4.95 kg per tree, 2.1 times higher than Beyrouti.

Material
Dargazie5
Treatment
PyroDwarf rootstocke5
Outcome
yielde5
Direction
highere5
Value
4.95 kg per treee5
Qualifier
2.1 times highere5
Comparator
Beyroutie5
Setting
Garden of Astan Quds Razavi, Mashhad, Irane7

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor role

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pear genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–124
e5

“‘Dargazi’ genotype and PyroDwarf rootstock produced the highest number (35.53 per tree), weight (195.04 g, 96.20% higher than ‘Beyrouti’) and yield (4.95 kg per tree, 2.1 times higher than ‘Beyrouti’) of pear fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1100–1314
e7

“was performed at the Garden of Astan Quds Razavi, Mashhad, Iran”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 387–450

Title

The rootstock type affecting fruit yield, and quality, and fire blight resistance of ‘Dargazi’ and ‘Beyrouti’ pear genotypes

Mostafa Alizadeh Fallah; Mehrab Yadegari; GholamHosein Davari Nejad; et al. Discover Plants. 2025. doi:10.1007/s44372-025-00217-0

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-e5460e5a2dba0084e80d31cdd0e44020296d67ac367729e34469a231297861f5 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer

grafting · yield · Pyrus communis (pear)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 7 positive, 5 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. positive
  8. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.