Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Phosphorus supply or deprivation caused only minor, non-significant changes in vacuole development in pea roots.

A claim from Development of Vacuolar Volume in the Root Tips of Pea · 1990

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus supply or deprivation caused only minor, non-significant changes in vacuole development in pea roots.

Treatment
Phosphorus supply or deprivatione4
Outcome
vacuole developmente4
Direction
no_changeinferrede4

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“primary root of pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 152–171
e4

“Phosphorus supply or deprivation produced only minor and non-significant changes in vacuole development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 788–891

Title

Development of Vacuolar Volume in the Root Tips of Pea

D. D. PATEL; P. W. BARLOW; R. B. LEE Annals of Botany 1990. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a087920

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-e564e04b3311dc3e38f5a344736a9c78fb92501b24a3add322475d9bb911f2fb · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

phosphorus · growth · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 23 positive, 1 negative or no effect

23 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.