Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Under severe drought, maize net photosynthesis was reduced by up to 68.1%.

A claim from Differential Physiological Responses of Zea mays and Sorghum bicolor to Drought Stress: Insights into the Ameliorative Role of Humic Acid at the Reproductive and Yield Stages · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under severe drought, maize net photosynthesis was reduced by up to 68.1%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
severe droughte1
Outcome
net photosynthesise1
Direction
reductionse1
Value
68.1%e1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Under severe drought, maize exhibited reductions up to 67.3% in stem dry mass, 68.1% in net photosynthesis, and 63.9% in grain yield, compared to 47.4%, 53.6%, and 54.6% reductions in sorghum, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–1096

Title

Differential Physiological Responses of Zea mays and Sorghum bicolor to Drought Stress: Insights into the Ameliorative Role of Humic Acid at the Reproductive and Yield Stages

Mohamed E. Abu-Ria; Wafaa M. Shukry; Samy A. Abo-Hamed; et al. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation 2025. doi:10.1007/s00344-025-11813-5

Other claims from this paper (16)

Record rev-e56de168b56547d7b49c2adf6adfee887cc532806c7a2329e33cb0a5a415ba75 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

drought · physiology: photosynthesis · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

121 papers: 13 positive, 108 negative or no effect

107 papers in the same direction as this claim · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

112 papers more in this group

See all 121 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.