Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Subsoiling had no significant effect on first-year shortleaf pine survival, diameter, or height.

A claim from Technical Note: Afforestation in North Mississippi on Retired Farmland Using Pinus echinata: First-Year Results · 2009

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Subsoiling had no significant effect on first-year shortleaf pine survival, diameter, or height.

Taxon
Pinus echinataPinus echinatat0
Treatment
Subsoil tillagee0
Outcome
1st-year survival, diameter, or heighte0
Direction
did not have a significant effecte0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus echinata
Pinus echinata · TaxonChris M · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Subsoil tillage did not have a significant effect on 1st-year survival, diameter, or height.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–889
t0

“Pinus echinata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–91

Title

Technical Note: Afforestation in North Mississippi on Retired Farmland Using Pinus echinata: First-Year Results

John D. Kushla Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 2009. doi:10.1093/sjaf/33.3.142

Other claims from this paper (2)

Record rev-e56e5fd3055c8eade8d803994403e61a41631263fff06d3e359fb632809f73de · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

tillage · growth · Pinus echinata (shortleaf pine)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.