Paper · 2010

Evaluating subsoiling and herbaceous weed control on shortleaf pine planted in retired farm land.

John D. Kushla

2
claims
4
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In March 2005, shortleaf pine was planted on retired fields of the Mississippi Agriculture and Forestry Experiment Station in Holly Springs. The objectives were to evaluate subsoiling and herbaceous weed control on first year seedling stocking, survival, and size. First year seedling measurements were made on stocking, survival, and size. Only results for first year seedling survival will be reported here. Subsoil tillage, herbaceous weed control, and control treatments were completed. Treatments were replicated 3 times in a randomized complete block design. The subsoiling treatment was done in December of 2004. The herbaceous weed control treatment was 4 ounces Arsenal AC® + 2 ounces Oust XP® per sprayed acre applied in a 4-foot band over the row in April 2005. In addition, mowing was completed 3 times between rows during the first growing season. Measurements were conducted on a 0.1-acre plot within each treatment. Neither subsoiling nor herbaceous weed control had any significant effect on seedling survival the first year.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Subsoiling had no statistically significant effect on first-year shortleaf pine seedling survival.

Taxon
shortleaf pinePinus echinatat0
Organ / stage
seedlinge0
Treatment
subsoilinge0
Outcome
seedling survivale0
Direction
Neithere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus echinata
Pinus echinata · TaxonChris M · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Neither subsoiling nor herbaceous weed control had any significant effect on seedling survival the first year.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 931–1041 · show in text ↑
t0

“shortleaf pine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbaceous weed control had no statistically significant effect on first-year shortleaf pine seedling survival.

Taxon
shortleaf pinePinus echinatat0
Organ / stage
seedlinge0
Treatment
herbaceous weed controle0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
seedling survivale0
Direction
Neithere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus echinata
Pinus echinata · TaxonChris M · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Neither subsoiling nor herbaceous weed control had any significant effect on seedling survival the first year.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 931–1041 · show in text ↑
t0

“shortleaf pine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–67 · show in text ↑

herbicide · growth · Pinus echinata (shortleaf pine)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

tillage · growth · Pinus echinata (shortleaf pine)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.