Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Elevated CO2 raised wheat leaf Ci by 74.0% relative to ambient CO2.

A claim from Effects of nitrogen application and elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration on photosynthesis of spring wheat at the jointing stage. · 2010

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 raised wheat leaf Ci by 74.0% relative to ambient CO2.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
elevated atmospheric CO2 concentratione0
Outcome
Cie0
Direction
highere0
Value
74.0%e0
Comparator
ambiment atmospheric CO2 concentratione0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Pn,Ci and WUE of spring wheat leaves which exposure to elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration were higher than the ambiment atmospheric CO2 concentration significantly,by 36.8%,74.0% and 102.7% in three nitrogen application rates,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1183

Title

Effects of nitrogen application and elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration on photosynthesis of spring wheat at the jointing stage.

Yu Jia; Xian-Feng YU; Guo Tian-wen; et al. Mailei zuowu xuebao 2010

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-e58252d1768beb31c63994f9f24c07fc3b59f8f291c8c451f795ba5df8e31f37 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

co2 · physiology: gas exchange · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 14 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this claim · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

19 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.