Intervention effectmodel-written summary

In wheat, stomatal conductance decreased within a few minutes of once-per-minute pulses of high CO₂.

A claim from Effects of pulses of elevated carbon dioxide concentration on stomatal conductance and photosynthesis in wheat and rice · 2013

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In wheat, stomatal conductance decreased within a few minutes of once-per-minute pulses of high CO₂.

Treatment
once per minute pulses of high CO₂e0
Outcome
Stomatal conductancee0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
within a few minutese0
Comparator
control set pointe2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Stomatal conductance decreased within a few minutes of exposure to once per minute pulses of high CO₂ of all the durations tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 467–596
e1

“Single leaves of wheat (Triticum aestivum cv Choptank) and rice (Oryza sativa cv Akitakomachi) were exposed for 30 minutes to pulses of elevated CO₂”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 214–362
e2

“pulses of CO₂ concentrations considerably above the control set point”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 83–152

Title

Effects of pulses of elevated carbon dioxide concentration on stomatal conductance and photosynthesis in wheat and rice

James A. Bunce Physiologia Plantarum 2013. doi:10.1111/ppl.12026

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-7dec78b2aa38dbbc0534016b78967e8364172dd7067ab9f632a5209624d46496 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

co2 · physiology: gas exchange · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 14 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this claim · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.