Paper · 2019 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Genotypic, Developmental and Environmental Effects on the Rapidity of gs in Wheat: Impacts on Carbon Gain and Water-Use Efficiency

Michele Faralli; James Cockram; Eric Ober; et al.

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
60
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Stomata are the primary gatekeepers for CO2 uptake for photosynthesis and water loss via transpiration and therefore play a central role in crop performance. Although stomatal conductance (gs) and assimilation rate (A) are often highly correlated, studies have demonstrated an uncoupling between A and gs that can result in sub-optimal physiological processes in dynamic light environments. Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is exposed to changes in irradiance due to leaf self-shading, moving clouds and shifting sun angle to which both A and gs respond. However, stomatal responses are generally an order of magnitude slower than photosynthetic responses, leading to non-synchronized A and gs responses that impact CO2 uptake and water use efficiency (iWUE). Here we phenotyped a panel of eight wheat cultivars (estimated to capture 80% of the single nucleotide polymorphism variation in North-West European bread wheat) for differences in the speed of stomatal responses (to changes in light intensity) and photosynthetic performance at different stages of development. The impact of water stress and elevated [CO2] on stomatal kinetics was also examined in a selected cultivar. Significant genotypic variation was reported for the time constant for stomatal opening (Ki, P=0.038) and the time to reach 95% steady state A (P=0.045). Slow gs opening responses limited A by ~10% and slow closure reduced iWUE, with these impacts found to be greatest in cultivars Soissons, Alchemy and Xi19. A decrease in stomatal rapidity (and thus an increase in the limitation of photosynthesis) (P<0.001) was found during the post-anthesis stage compared to the early booting stage. Reduced water availability triggered stomatal closure and asymmetric stomatal opening and closing responses, while elevated atmospheric [CO2] conditions reduced the time for stomatal opening during a low to high light transition, thus suggesting a major environmental effect on dynamic stomatal kinetics. We discuss these findings in terms of exploiting various traits to develop idiotypes for specific environments, and suggest that intraspecific variation in the rapidity of stomatal responses could provide a potential unexploited breeding target to optimize the physiological responses of wheat to dynamic field conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat cultivars varied significantly in time constant for stomatal opening.

Outcome
time constant for stomatal openinge0
Direction
variatione0
Value
P=0.038e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant genotypic variation was reported for the time constant for stomatal opening (Ki, P=0.038)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1177–1278 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat cultivars varied significantly in time to 95% steady state assimilation.

Outcome
time to reach 95% steady state Ae0
Direction
variatione1
Value
P=0.045e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the time to reach 95% steady state A (P=0.045)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1283–1329 · show in text ↑
e1

“Significant genotypic variation was reported”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1177–1221 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Slow stomatal opening limited assimilation by about 10%.

Outcome
Ae0
Direction
limitede0
Value
~10%e0
Qualifier
Slow gs opening responsese0

Not reportedOrgan / stage

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Slow gs opening responses limited A by ~10%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1331–1374 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Slow stomatal closure reduced intrinsic water use efficiency.

Outcome
iWUEe0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
slow closuree0

Not reportedOrgan / stage

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“slow closure reduced iWUE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1379–1404 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The impacts of slow stomatal responses were greatest in Soissons.

Material
Soissonse0
Outcome
impactse0
Direction
greateste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“these impacts found to be greatest in cultivars Soissons, Alchemy and Xi19”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1411–1485 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The impacts of slow stomatal responses were greatest in Alchemy.

Material
Alchemye0
Outcome
impactse0
Direction
greateste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“these impacts found to be greatest in cultivars Soissons, Alchemy and Xi19”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1411–1485 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The impacts of slow stomatal responses were greatest in Xi19.

Material
Xi19e0
Outcome
impactse0
Direction
greateste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“these impacts found to be greatest in cultivars Soissons, Alchemy and Xi19”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1411–1485 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Stomatal rapidity decreased after anthesis relative to early booting.

Organ / stage
post-anthesis stagee0
Outcome
stomatal rapiditye0
Direction
decreasee0
Comparator
early booting stagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A decrease in stomatal rapidity (and thus an increase in the limitation of photosynthesis) (P<0.001) was found during the post-anthesis stage compared to the early booting stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1487–1664 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Photosynthetic limitation increased after anthesis relative to early booting.

Outcome
limitation of photosynthesise0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
early booting stagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an increase in the limitation of photosynthesis) (P<0.001) was found during the post-anthesis stage compared to the early booting stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1529–1664 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced water availability triggered stomatal closure.

Treatment
Reduced water availabilitye0
Outcome
stomatal closuree0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Reduced water availability triggered stomatal closure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1666–1719 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced water availability triggered asymmetric stomatal opening and closing responses.

Treatment
Reduced water availabilitye0
Outcome
asymmetric stomatal opening and closing responsese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Reduced water availability triggered stomatal closure and asymmetric stomatal opening and closing responses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1666–1773 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated carbon dioxide shortened stomatal opening time during a low to high light transition.

Treatment
elevated atmospheric [CO2] conditionse0
Outcome
time for stomatal openinge0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
during a low to high light transitione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“elevated atmospheric [CO2] conditions reduced the time for stomatal opening during a low to high light transition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1781–1894 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest stomatal response rapidity as a potential wheat breeding target.

Outcome
potential unexploited breeding targete0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“intraspecific variation in the rapidity of stomatal responses could provide a potential unexploited breeding target to optimize the physiological responses of wheat to dynamic field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2100–2292 · show in text ↑

co2 · physiology: gas exchange · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 14 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

soil water · physiology: gas exchange · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.