Paper · 2018 · Global Change Biology

Benefits of increasing transpiration efficiency in wheat under elevated CO2 for rainfed regions

Brendan Christy; Sabine Tausz‐Posch; Michael Tausz; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
74
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Higher transpiration efficiency ( TE ) has been proposed as a mechanism to increase crop yields in dry environments where water availability usually limits yield. The application of a coupled radiation and TE simulation model shows wheat yield advantage of a high‐ TE cultivar (cv. Drysdale) over its almost identical low‐ TE parent line (Hartog), from about −7 to 558 kg/ha (mean 187 kg/ha) over the rainfed cropping region in Australia (221–1,351 mm annual rainfall), under the present‐day climate. The smallest absolute yield response occurred in the more extreme drier and wetter areas of the wheat belt. However, under elevated CO 2 conditions, the response of Drysdale was much greater overall, ranging from 51 to 886 kg/ha (mean 284 kg/ha) with the greatest response in the higher rainfall areas. Changes in simulated TE under elevated CO 2 conditions are seen across Australia with notable increased areas of higher TE under a drier climate in Western Australia, Queensland and parts of New South Wales and Victoria. This improved efficiency is subtly deceptive, with highest yields not necessarily directly correlated with highest TE . Nevertheless, the advantage of Drysdale over Hartog is clear with the benefit of the trait advantage attributed to TE ranging from 102% to 118% (mean 109%). The potential annual cost‐benefits of this increased genetic TE trait across the wheat growing areas of Australia (5 year average of area planted to wheat) totaled AUD 631 MIL (5‐year average wheat price of AUD /260 t) with an average of 187 kg/ha under the present climate. The benefit to an individual farmer will depend on location but elevated CO 2 raises this nation‐wide benefit to AUD 796 MIL in a 2°C warmer climate, slightly lower ( AUD 715 MIL ) if rainfall is also reduced by 20%.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

The high-TE wheat cultivar Drysdale yielded on average 187 kg/ha more than its low-TE parent Hartog in the rainfed region under present climate.

Treatment
high‐ TE cultivar (cv. Drysdale)e0
Outcome
wheat yielde0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
187 kg/hae0
Comparator
low‐ TE parent line (Hartog)e0
Setting
rainfed cropping region in Australiae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“transpiration efficiency in wheat under elevated CO2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“wheat yield advantage of a high‐ TE cultivar (cv. Drysdale) over its almost identical low‐ TE parent line (Hartog), from about −7 to 558 kg/ha (mean 187 kg/ha) over the rainfed cropping region in Australia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 241–446 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Under elevated CO2 the yield response of Drysdale was greater, averaging 284 kg/ha.

Treatment
elevated CO 2 conditionse1
Outcome
response of Drysdalee1
Direction
greatere1
Value
284 kg/hae1
Qualifier
ranging from 51 to 886 kg/hae1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“transpiration efficiency in wheat under elevated CO2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–75 · show in text ↑
e1

“under elevated CO 2 conditions, the response of Drysdale was much greater overall, ranging from 51 to 886 kg/ha (mean 284 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 627–755 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Under elevated CO2 the areas of higher TE increased under a drier climate in Western Australia, Queensland and parts of New South Wales and Victoria.

Treatment
elevated CO 2 conditionse2
Outcome
areas of higher TEe2
Direction
increasede2
Setting
Western Australia, Queensland and parts of New South Wales and Victoriae2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“transpiration efficiency in wheat under elevated CO2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–75 · show in text ↑
e2

“Changes in simulated TE under elevated CO 2 conditions are seen across Australia with notable increased areas of higher TE under a drier climate in Western Australia, Queensland and parts of New South Wales and Victoria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–1032 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

The highest yields were not necessarily directly correlated with the highest TE.

Outcome
highest yieldse3
Qualifier
not necessarily directly correlated with highest TEe3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“transpiration efficiency in wheat under elevated CO2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–75 · show in text ↑
e3

“highest yields not necessarily directly correlated with highest TE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1085–1151 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

The benefit of the TE trait for Drysdale over Hartog ranged from 102% to 118%.

Treatment
trait advantage attributed to TEe4
Outcome
benefit of the trait advantage attributed to TEe4
Direction
higherinferrede4
Value
102% to 118%e4
Comparator
Hartoge4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“transpiration efficiency in wheat under elevated CO2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–75 · show in text ↑
e4

“the advantage of Drysdale over Hartog is clear with the benefit of the trait advantage attributed to TE ranging from 102% to 118% (mean 109%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1168–1309 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

The potential annual cost-benefit of the higher-TE trait across Australian wheat areas totals AUD 631 MIL.

Outcome
potential annual cost‐benefits of this increased genetic TE traite5
Value
AUD 631 MILe5
Setting
wheat growing areas of Australiae5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“transpiration efficiency in wheat under elevated CO2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–75 · show in text ↑
e5

“The potential annual cost‐benefits of this increased genetic TE trait across the wheat growing areas of Australia (5 year average of area planted to wheat) totaled AUD 631 MIL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1311–1486 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositiveprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 raises the nation-wide benefit to AUD 796 MIL in a 2°C warmer climate.

Treatment
elevated CO 2e6
Outcome
nation‐wide benefite6
Direction
raisese6
Value
AUD 796 MILe6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“transpiration efficiency in wheat under elevated CO2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–75 · show in text ↑
e6

“elevated CO 2 raises this nation‐wide benefit to AUD 796 MIL in a 2°C warmer climate, slightly lower ( AUD 715 MIL ) if rainfall is also reduced by 20%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1650–1801 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativeprojected

Claim · model-written summary

If rainfall is also reduced by 20%, the nation-wide benefit is slightly lower at AUD 715 MIL.

Treatment
rainfall is also reduced by 20%e6
Outcome
nation‐wide benefite6
Direction
lowere6
Value
AUD 715 MILe6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“transpiration efficiency in wheat under elevated CO2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–75 · show in text ↑
e6

“elevated CO 2 raises this nation‐wide benefit to AUD 796 MIL in a 2°C warmer climate, slightly lower ( AUD 715 MIL ) if rainfall is also reduced by 20%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1650–1801 · show in text ↑

co2 · physiology: gas exchange · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 14 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.