Paper · 1993 · Journal of Agricultural Meteorology

Growth and water use of wheat under present and future levels of CO2

R. Leuning; Y. P. Wang; D. de Pury; et al.

10
claims
18
verbatim quotes
9
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A mechanistic simulation model was used to examine the expected responses of wheat to a doubling in atmospheric CO2 concentration in combination with a 2°C rise in temperature. The model produced satisfactory simulations of total biomass, leaf area and canopy transpiration under present climatic conditions. However, soil evaporation was underestimated by up to 35% by the simulations. Model predictions suggested that increased CO2 levels should lead to increased biomass and potential yields of wheat up to about 550ppm, after which photosynthesis under full sunlight increases only gradually with CO2. Higher temperatures are expected to decrease biomass production by shortening the growing season and by increasing plant respiration. A doubling of CO2 concentration and a temperature increase of 2°C is expected to cause only marginal changes in biomass production. Transpiration use efficiency may be enhanced by -20% with a doubling of CO2 above current levels.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The model satisfactorily simulated total biomass, leaf area and canopy transpiration.

Outcome
satisfactory simulations of total biomass, leaf area and canopy transpiratione0
Comparator
present climatic conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–29 · show in text ↑
e0

“The model produced satisfactory simulations of total biomass, leaf area and canopy transpiration under present climatic conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–307 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The model underestimated soil evaporation by up to 35%.

Outcome
soil evaporatione0
Direction
underestimatede0
Value
35%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–29 · show in text ↑
e0

“soil evaporation was underestimated by up to 35% by the simulations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 318–385 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing CO2 was predicted to increase wheat biomass up to about 550ppm.

Treatment
increased CO2 levelse0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
up to about 550ppme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased CO2 levels should lead to increased biomass and potential yields of wheat up to about 550ppm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 420–522 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing CO2 was predicted to increase potential wheat yields up to about 550ppm.

Treatment
increased CO2 levelse0
Outcome
potential yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
up to about 550ppme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased CO2 levels should lead to increased biomass and potential yields of wheat up to about 550ppm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 420–522 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Above about 550ppm, photosynthesis under full sunlight was predicted to increase only gradually with CO2.

Treatment
CO2e0
Outcome
photosynthesise0
Direction
increasese0
Qualifier
under full sunlighte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–29 · show in text ↑
e0

“after which photosynthesis under full sunlight increases only gradually with CO2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–604 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Higher temperature was expected to decrease wheat biomass production.

Treatment
Higher temperaturese0
Outcome
biomass productione0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–29 · show in text ↑
e0

“Higher temperatures are expected to decrease biomass production by shortening the growing season and by increasing plant respiration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 606–738 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Higher temperature was expected to shorten the wheat growing season.

Treatment
Higher temperaturese0
Outcome
growing seasone0
Direction
shorteninge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–29 · show in text ↑
e0

“Higher temperatures are expected to decrease biomass production by shortening the growing season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 606–702 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Higher temperature was expected to increase wheat respiration.

Treatment
Higher temperaturese0
Outcome
plant respiratione0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–29 · show in text ↑
e0

“Higher temperatures are expected to decrease biomass production by shortening the growing season and by increasing plant respiration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 606–738 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

A doubling of CO2 with a 2°C temperature increase was expected to produce only marginal biomass change.

Treatment
A doubling of CO2 concentration and a temperature increase of 2°Ce0
Outcome
biomass productione0
Direction
marginal changese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–29 · show in text ↑
e0

“A doubling of CO2 concentration and a temperature increase of 2°C is expected to cause only marginal changes in biomass production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 740–870 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Doubling CO2 may enhance wheat transpiration use efficiency by -20%.

Treatment
a doubling of CO2e0
Outcome
Transpiration use efficiencye0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
-20%e0
Comparator
current levelse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–29 · show in text ↑
e0

“Transpiration use efficiency may be enhanced by -20% with a doubling of CO2 above current levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–968 · show in text ↑

co2 · physiology: gas exchange · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 14 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

co2 · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

145 papers: 124 positive, 21 negative or no effect

123 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

141 papers more in this group

See all 145 papers →

co2 · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

203 papers: 174 positive, 29 negative or no effect

173 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

199 papers more in this group

See all 203 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.