Paper · 1995 · Global Change Biology

Effects of elevated CO2 and/or O3 on growth, development and physiology of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

JEREMY D. BARNES; JOHN H. OLLERENSHAW; CLARE P. WHITFIELD

15
claims
52
verbatim quotes
86
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Two cultivars of spring wheat ( Triticum aestivum L. cvs. Alexandria and Hanno) and three cultivars of winter wheat (cvs. Riband, Mercia and Haven) were grown at two concentrations of CO 2 [ambient (355 pmol mol −1 ) and elevated (708 μmol mol −1 )] under two O 3 regimes [clean air (< 5 nmol mol −1 O 3 ) and polluted air (15 nmol mol −1 O 3 at night rising to a midday maximum of 75 nmol mol −1 )] in a phytotron at the University of Newcastle‐upon‐Tyne. Between the two‐leaf stage and anthesis, measurements of leaf gas‐exchange, non‐structural carbohydrate content, visible O 3 damage, growth, dry matter partitioning, yield components and root development were made in order to examine responses to elevated CO 2 and/or O 3 . Growth at elevated CO 2 resulted in a sustained increase in the rate of CO 2 assimilation, but after roughly 6 weeks' exposure there was evidence of a slight decline in the photosynthetic rate (c.‐15%) measured under growth conditions which was most pronounced in the winter cultivars. Enhanced rates of CO 2 assimilation were accompanied by a decrease in stomatal conductance which improved the instantaneous water use efficiency of individual leaves. CO 2 enrichment stimulated shoot and root growth to an equivalent extent, and increased tillering and yield components, however, non‐structural carbohydrates still accumulated in source leaves. In contrast, long‐term exposure to O 3 resulted in a decreased CO 2 assimilation rate (c. ‐13%), partial stomatal closure, and the accumulation of fructan and starch in leaves in the light. These effects were manifested in decreased rates of shoot and root growth, with root growth more severely affected than shoot growth. In the combined treatment growth of O 3 ‐treated plants was enhanced by elevated CO 2 , but there was little evidence that CO 2 enrichment afforded additional protection against O 3 damage. The reduction in growth induced by O 3 at elevated CO 2 was similar to that induced by O 3 at ambient CO 2 despite additive effects of the individual gases on stomatal conductance that would be expected to reduce the O 3 flux by 20%, and also CO 2 ‐induced increases in the provision of substrates for detoxification and repair processes. These observations suggest that CO 2 enrichment may render plants more susceptible to O 3 damage at the cellular level. Possible mechanisms are discussed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 resulted in a sustained increase in the rate of CO2 assimilation in wheat compared with ambient CO2.

Treatment
elevated CO 2e2
Outcome
rate of CO 2 assimilatione2
Direction
increasee2
Qualifier
sustainede2
Comparator
ambiente1
Setting
phytotrone3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“physiology of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“[ambient (355 pmol mol”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 198–220 · show in text ↑
e2

“Growth at elevated CO 2 resulted in a sustained increase in the rate of CO 2 assimilation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 740–829 · show in text ↑
e3

“in a phytotron at the University”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 409–441 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After roughly 6 weeks of elevated CO2, photosynthetic rate declined slightly, most markedly in winter cultivars.

Treatment
elevated CO 2e2
Outcome
photosynthetic ratee4
Direction
declinee4
Qualifier
most pronounced in the winter cultivarse5
Comparator
ambiente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“physiology of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“[ambient (355 pmol mol”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 198–220 · show in text ↑
e2

“Growth at elevated CO 2 resulted in a sustained increase in the rate of CO 2 assimilation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 740–829 · show in text ↑
e4

“after roughly 6 weeks' exposure there was evidence of a slight decline in the photosynthetic rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 835–932 · show in text ↑
e5

“which was most pronounced in the winter cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1024 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 decreased stomatal conductance in wheat.

Treatment
elevated CO 2e2
Outcome
stomatal conductancee6
Direction
decreasee6
Comparator
ambiente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“physiology of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“[ambient (355 pmol mol”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 198–220 · show in text ↑
e2

“Growth at elevated CO 2 resulted in a sustained increase in the rate of CO 2 assimilation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 740–829 · show in text ↑
e6

“Enhanced rates of CO 2 assimilation were accompanied by a decrease in stomatal conductance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 improved the instantaneous water use efficiency of individual wheat leaves.

Treatment
elevated CO 2e2
Outcome
instantaneous water use efficiencye7
Direction
improvede7
Comparator
ambiente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“physiology of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“[ambient (355 pmol mol”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 198–220 · show in text ↑
e2

“Growth at elevated CO 2 resulted in a sustained increase in the rate of CO 2 assimilation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 740–829 · show in text ↑
e7

“which improved the instantaneous water use efficiency of individual leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1117–1191 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CO2 enrichment stimulated shoot and root growth of wheat to an equivalent extent.

Treatment
CO 2 enrichmente2
Outcome
shoot and root growthe2
Direction
stimulatede2
Qualifier
to an equivalent extente2
Comparator
ambiente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“physiology of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“[ambient (355 pmol mol”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 198–220 · show in text ↑
e2

“CO 2 enrichment stimulated shoot and root growth to an equivalent extent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1193–1265 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CO2 enrichment increased tillering and yield components of wheat.

Treatment
CO 2 enrichmente2
Outcome
tillering and yield componentse3
Direction
increasede3
Comparator
ambiente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“physiology of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“[ambient (355 pmol mol”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 198–220 · show in text ↑
e2

“CO 2 enrichment stimulated shoot and root growth to an equivalent extent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1193–1265 · show in text ↑
e3

“increased tillering and yield components”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1271–1311 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Long-term exposure to O3 decreased the CO2 assimilation rate of wheat.

Treatment
exposure to O 3e2
Outcome
CO 2 assimilation ratee2
Direction
decreasede2
Comparator
clean aire1
Setting
phytotrone3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“physiology of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“[clean air (< 5 nmol mol”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 281–305 · show in text ↑
e2

“exposure to O 3 resulted in a decreased CO 2 assimilation rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1410–1472 · show in text ↑
e3

“in a phytotron at the University”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 409–441 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

O3 caused partial stomatal closure in wheat.

Treatment
exposure to O 3e2
Outcome
partial stomatal closuree3
Comparator
clean aire1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“physiology of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“[clean air (< 5 nmol mol”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 281–305 · show in text ↑
e2

“exposure to O 3 resulted in a decreased CO 2 assimilation rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1410–1472 · show in text ↑
e3

“partial stomatal closure, and the accumulation of fructan and starch in leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1484–1562 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

O3 increased accumulation of fructan and starch in wheat leaves.

Treatment
exposure to O 3e2
Outcome
fructan and starch in leavese3
Direction
accumulatione3
Comparator
clean aire1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“physiology of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“[clean air (< 5 nmol mol”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 281–305 · show in text ↑
e2

“exposure to O 3 resulted in a decreased CO 2 assimilation rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1410–1472 · show in text ↑
e3

“partial stomatal closure, and the accumulation of fructan and starch in leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1484–1562 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

O3 decreased shoot and root growth of wheat.

Treatment
exposure to O 3e2
Outcome
shoot and root growthe4
Direction
decreasede4
Comparator
clean aire1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“physiology of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“[clean air (< 5 nmol mol”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 281–305 · show in text ↑
e2

“exposure to O 3 resulted in a decreased CO 2 assimilation rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1410–1472 · show in text ↑
e4

“decreased rates of shoot and root growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1610–1650 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

O3 affected root growth more severely than shoot growth in wheat.

Treatment
exposure to O 3e1
Outcome
root growthe2
Direction
more severely affectede2
Comparator
shoot growthe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“physiology of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“exposure to O 3 resulted in a decreased CO 2 assimilation rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1410–1472 · show in text ↑
e2

“with root growth more severely affected than shoot growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1652–1709 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 enhanced the growth of O3-treated wheat.

Treatment
elevated CO 2e2
Outcome
growthe1
Direction
enhancede2
Comparator
O 3e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“physiology of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“In the combined treatment growth of O 3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1711–1750 · show in text ↑
e2

“was enhanced by elevated CO 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1767–1796 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 gave little additional protection of wheat against O3 damage.

Treatment
CO 2 enrichmente1
Outcome
protection against O 3 damagee1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“physiology of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“there was little evidence that CO 2 enrichment afforded additional protection against O 3 damage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1803–1899 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The growth reduction induced by O3 was similar at elevated and ambient CO2 in wheat.

Treatment
O 3 at elevated CO 2e1
Outcome
reduction in growthe1
Direction
similare1
Comparator
O 3 at ambient CO 2e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“physiology of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“The reduction in growth induced by O 3 at elevated CO 2 was similar to that induced by O 3 at ambient CO 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1901–2007 · show in text ↑
Associationhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

CO2 enrichment may make wheat more susceptible to O3 damage at the cellular level.

Treatment
CO 2 enrichmente1
Outcome
O 3 damagee1
Direction
more susceptiblee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“physiology of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“These observations suggest that CO 2 enrichment may render plants more susceptible to O 3 damage at the cellular level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2240–2358 · show in text ↑

ozone · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

58 papers: 14 positive, 44 negative or no effect

43 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

54 papers more in this group

See all 58 papers →

co2 · pest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 9 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

co2 · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

145 papers: 124 positive, 21 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 124 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

141 papers more in this group

See all 145 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.