Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Micronutrient fertilization significantly increased leaf Zn concentration and shoot Zn uptake in the rainy season.

A claim from Micronutrient supply through granular-coated single superphosphate under field conditions · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Micronutrient fertilization significantly increased leaf Zn concentration and shoot Zn uptake in the rainy season.

Treatment
Micronutrient fertilizatione1
Outcome
leaf concentration and shoot uptake of Zne1
Direction
increasese1
Qualifier
during the rainy seasone1
Comparator
unfertilized controle1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“corn (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–368
e1

“Micronutrient fertilization showed, relative to the unfertilized control, significant increases in shoot biomass at flowering, crop yield (corn silage and soybean grain), and leaf concentration and shoot uptake of Zn and Mn during the rainy season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–1081

Title

Micronutrient supply through granular-coated single superphosphate under field conditions

Fernando C. Bachiega Zambrosi; José A. Quaggio Journal of Crop Improvement 2017. doi:10.1080/15427528.2017.1303799

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-e589951a40ac00ceebb6daffc9ff3b3b4ed295719e67ec4f16e812373d7191d7 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

micronutrient · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 14 positive, 1 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,164 papers: 1,026 positive, 138 negative or no effect

1,025 papers in the same direction as this claim · 127 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. no effect

1,155 papers more in this group

See all 1,164 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.